Nigel Mortimers libelous statement About Sacha Christie in the guise of an open letter to Peter Robbins

Nigel Mortimer
4 hrs ·

AN OPEN LETTER TO PETER ROBBINS.
Hi Peter, You know that we have been friends with you on FB for some years now (that is both Helen and myself) and in that time we have shared some insightful views regarding UFOs and our mutual love of books and bookshops. In a way, although we met many years ago in Leeds, I feel that I know you on a spiritual level and resonate with who you really are. I hope that you continue to see our friendship in a mutual and respectful way.

Last night, I listened to you being interviewed on this show: https://inceptionradionetwork.com/peter-robbins-ken-cherry/

I am fully aware of what has been happening in recent months with regards to Larry and yourself, but I feel that I have to say something concerning this as I too (and Helen and my family) have been affected by certain 'players' involed in the evolution of it all.
Before I go on to that, I just want to say that I respect you fully for stating fairly in the show that you have no doubts that Larry was at the Rendlesham Forest site (at Capel Green) in 1980, even though you have some concerns with regards to some of the other accusations about him being made at this time and this has led you to believe that Larry may have been dishonest about information he has shared with you down the years?

I do not know if Larry is telling the full truth about his encounter and involvement, whether he has forgotten certain aspects, or if he is confused about the way he was actually involved. On the other hand, it may be the case that Larry is telling it exactly as it happened. Due to that, I have to weigh up all sides of the argument and look at those involved in promoting their views that he is making things up. I can do this, as I have been affected on a personal level by these people -the ones who live day and night trying to persuade others that Larry is a liar, almost to the level of obsession.

I am really writing this to you Peter (and I want others to be able to read this so that there can be no confusion as to what I did say to you) because I feel that certain parties involved in RF in the UK are trying to manoeuvre you against Larry, not for the benefit of seeking the truth regards the case (as they often claim) but to satisfy their own 'hatred' of Larry Warren on a very personal level.

In my view, people like Sacha Christie, Alyson Dunlop and David Young (amongst others in a tight-knit little gang of gangstalkers) attack people that they do not 'get on with' or people who do not align themselves with their own viewpoints. I know this as a fact Peter, as I (like Larry) have been a victim of personal abuse, gangstalking and internet vitriol by these named people. So much so, that I had to report Sacha Christie and her associates to the police for their unwarranted actions on me and my loved ones. (Sending photo's of disgusting images in emails to me
and calling me and Helen immature names is not 'serious Ufology'). I can tell you Peter, I did nothing at all to this person and her associates to encourage or deserve that kind of hateful behaviour at any time. There are a number of other good people in the subject here in the UK that have been treated in this way and some are even (unlike myself) frightened to speak out about them because they have seen what will happen.

I know you are sensible to be able to listen to all sides Peter. I have never doubted your integrity. But please consider fully what you are being told about Larry if the source is from these gangstalkers. They lie and twist the truth whenever they can in order to paint only their own picture. They do not care about the consequences of doing this. Their involvement in Ufology is to cause havoc and trouble. I have seen it happen more than once for it to be coincidence.

I like Larry. I sense that he is a good soul. I have personal reasons as to why I do not think he is making anything up about his involvement in 1980 at RF and this is nothing to do with taking sides (I have been called 'Larry's bitch' by these gangstalkers), but has more to do with actual Ufology. I am working on the fact that at the time of the RF incident in 1980, numerous similar UFOs were encountered in the UK (within days /months) that hold specific aspects as those found at RF. Larry has mentioned one of these, the OBOL (orange ball of light) associated with the landed UFO at RF in 1980. A couple of weeks prior to him encountering it, I too observed an OBOL close to the NSA base at Menwith Hill in 1980. This changed my life into a quest seeking UFO truths for nearly 40 years.

Please be careful in whatever you decide about Larry, Peter. Please don't let these nasty individuals use you for their own ends. They are cunning and will stoop to the lowest levels to cause confusion so as to take everyone's eye away from what is really important here. An honest search for the truth regards RF.

This is not said to you as an attack back at such people like Sacha Christie, Alyson Dunlop, et' all. I have moved on from what they have done to me and Helen, but I will always stick up for those who they attack in the manner they choose to do so which is in my view abhorrent. If you are in any way different to them,they attack you. (they attack me because I channel and investigate 'portals')... It is, in fact, a kind of racism.

Peter, you have a long held friendship with Larry. You know him better than most people, certainly better than the gangstalkers who, in the main, are relatively new to the UFO scene. None of us are perfect Peter, we all know that and I am certain to some degree Larry will have made mistakes. A complete and utter liar? No, I don't think so. The one thing I can tell you is that he does not go out of his way to upset people. He does not send disgusting emails to people and he does not get his son to threaten to kill you in private messages (hey, Sacha Christie?)!
Yes, I am aware that Larry blows his top from time to time. This is totally understandable when you consider what these vile people do to you and then try to act all innocent like to the outside world.

PLEASE Peter, consider everything. The book you wrote with Larry is a classic appraisal of the events of 1980. Larry has his story to tell in it and your joint investigations down the years have kept a focus on the site which is so important to the realisation of UFO truth when that happens. Don't let these people distract you from that. They only have one agenda. To destroy Larry Warren and anyone like myself, who tries to take a sensible, unbiased approach to all of this.

My very best wishes and love,

from Nigel & Helen.

New Peter Robbins Interview. Larry Warren Did Not Tell The Truth.

As you can imagine, I'm in a state of shock right now. Peter Robbins states categorically in a very Frank interview with Alan B. Smith on Inception Radio, that Warren LIED to him on many different matters and calls his rock memorabilia business into question.

The interview lasts an hour and is far from comprehensive in specific details, we can expect the specifics soon.


More to follow

Alan B. Smith and Peter Robbins Interview on Inception Radio

Larry Warrens Hypnosis Transcript Never Mentioned.

The next transcript to follow will be his FAKED hypnosis with Fred Max. 

He admitted he faked it, read You Can't Tell The People, Georgina Bruni. He said he faked it because he's a people pleaser. Someone paid money for it, he didn't want to let them down. Would a let anyone hypnotise them properly?  

Art Wallace Testimony, Larry Warrens account as given to Barry Greenwood and Larry Fawcet for Clear intent.

Larry Warren's Military Records are Definitely Tampered With. Facts to follow on the HPANWO show with Ben Emlyn-Jones & Warren 11th May 2017.

Due to the many inconsistencies of Larry Warren, we decided the best way to end the controversy would be to have his documents analysed. We had several hope-filled times where it seemed the analysis was being done, waiting patiently for the final result, only to be told weeks later that they couldn't/wouldn't do it.

One analyst said no thank you, Larry Warren is a very dangerous man. I fear for the safety of my staff, myself and the reputation of my firm. Another said we will only work from the original documents, but he also stated that just glancing over them there were definitely concerns and these warranted investigation. Another lady said yes I'll do it then four weeks later stated she couldn't, she was too ill and we were back at square one again. 

Warren point blank refuses to show them or have them looked at, yet states he has the originals and they do not match the ones in his book or on the net, which is where they have been without complaint up until recently. 

It doesn't really matter in the end. This week in one of Warren's insanity rants he stated the documents HAVE been tampered with. He then says that Peter had them for years. Now this is the fascinating bit. IF Peter has tampered with Warren's documents, he has managed to emulate Warren's writing! While they were partners, Peter set him up? 

Okay, these documents we have, they are from Warren's book. They match exactly. Now I think he is talking about the Echols medical sheet in his rant. The copy I have was in Georgina Bruni's collection and is the original with tippex. In the book the document is exactly the same only you can't see the tippex. 

He also stated this week that I had somehow fabricated Adrian Bustinza's comments made to John Burroughs on his post in a group about the Rendlesham CNN documentary. I am not a member of that group and therefore cannot post in it. but somehow I have managed to. Or maybe I am in league with John Burroughs..... Maybe the fact is quite simply, Larry Warren is a liar. 

Screenshots of the conversation were sent to me and somehow Warren is going to prove I altered Adrian's words and also his comments on the radio show. I embedded the show on my blog, Left Out At East Gate, the upload is not mine. I haven't downloaded it, edited it, re-uploaded it. That would be a copyright infringement besides everything else. 

So according to Warren I faked all his photos, faked his artwork, stole it, sold it in an auction he sold items in too, yet he got all the other items sent back to him from the same auction lot and sold items in the same auction I managed to sell a painting I stole from him in too in 2013? I tampered with the A10 photo too, I messed with all his stuff. Okay lets look at what that is saying then.

All of his evidence and items are all tampered with, altered, fake, stolen. He is an innocent man. We all set him up while we were still friends and supporting him rabidly. That makes complete sense if you are a total moron. I am a thief, a drug addict, a child abuser, an ex mental patient, mentally ill housewife who's mum locked her up for a year because she didn't know what to do with her. I am a forger, All total lies.

He states I have never had an experience in my life, never seen a UFO, never helped anyone, I just destroy lives. He has a problem with my tits and teeth for some reason, says I love him and this is all over that. Said he was telling myself and partner off for us taking drugs in front of the children in our filthy hovel and that is why he left. The opposite is true. Dave kicked him out for his constant atrocious behaviour caused by drinking and cocaine. 

He also makes out my daughter is some sicko slut, looking at porn and pictures of dead boys while in the room with him one night and was showing him this. Definitely the other way around. I could say more but haven't. 

So here is the latest set of screenshots;

SACHA DID IT

PETER DID IT

*Please note, I cannot see warren, he can't see me either. These screenshots were sent as is but they're damning enough*.

Well from the horse's mouth himself. It is all tampered with. That means he needs to start producing his evidence and military records to show the alterations. He states himself he has the originals. He needs to show everyone what he is talking about then. 

He is now attempting to make things look like I and others set him up, but in reality he is trying to turn his lies onto everyone else. He is setting me up. Now it looks like he is going to turn it on Peter too. 

Peter will be making a statement in due time. We have spoken since my blog . I understand how difficult this is for him, I went through the same thing. Only my aftershocks will not be as many or as deeply affecting as Peter's. He stood by him for just short of three decades. If I can understand his position right now, I hope you would stretch yourself to that open-mindedness too. 

So tomorrow, which will be Thursday May 11th 2017, Warren is being given another platform to lie by Ben Emlyn-Jones on HPANWO radio. He is going to state the FACTS. Please don't miss it, it might be the 'best worst'  broadcast in ufology, ever. A very public Swan Song. It's not a live show but there will be a chatroom. Good luck asking a reasonable question though!

LARRY WARREN RETURNS HPANWO SHOW 236

Also see

Open Letter to Peter robbins

Opened Lettuce to Sacha Christie & Co.

Update 14th May 2017

Today Mick Sayer (finder of the UFO in the A10 photo) found a very interesting bit of information.

Dr Echols definitely worked at Lakenheath, only he was an orthopedic Dr, NOT an Opthalmologist or Osteopathic!

UPDATE 16TH MAY 2017

Warren states that he has the originals, the same originals Peter had that he alludes to him having altered, This means that the original documents have been tampered with. The ones he has. So there was literally no point in continuing further.

Nigel Mortimer reared his head again, trying to make out I'd stolen the six hundred pounds raised for the analysis. Even Tony Topping, friend of twelve years chimed in about it. Tony was told to remove me from his life by Mortimer or he couldn't speak at the conference that never happened.

Tony sent me a freind request a little while ago, no message, no phone call. I deleted his request, I can't respect that. So now he is there telling Mortimer to look into things, making out I am a thief too. Personal friends since 2005 and he throws me away then acts like I've harmed him in some way! Shameful.

Everyone was given there money back within an hour of our decision. No one is going to get the names of those people, that's always been confidential. We have said publicly many times it has been returned, if that was a lie you can be sure people will have said so. Some of them are friends of Warren's, they would be the first to yelp about it. I never had any access to it anyway! 

Absolutely no reason for them to come up with any of this. It's just pointless noise making to make me look bad because all of the above is completely normal, rational behaviour obviously. Oh yeah and of course in the ten years we were friends and all the times i was single I never once wanted any kind of physical contact from him.

Nor did I move to Liverpool following him, I moved here to be with Dave. What I did say to him was that when i was weighing up the decision to uproot my family to a city I didn't know very well, was that at least I had one friend there. How wrong I was about that, but the move to be with Dave was the best move I've made in my life.

Believe the gossip, it is A LOT easier than using your brain and doing your homework isn't it? It also says everything about them and nothing about me. They're like giant nine year olds with Tourettes.