 |
| The Halt Perspective Available Now |
5pm tonight UK time
Col Halt ret. Will be joining us in the chatroom.
Blog post to follow.
Saturday, 4 March 2017
Col Charles Halt talks frankly to Alyson Dunlop on the ADX Files Show
Wednesday, 15 February 2017
Translate
The latest Warrengate developments including (new) Podcast with Alyson Dunlop
 |
| Ben's analysis "proving" it's not Warren. why not use a photo with glasses? |
 |
| According to Ben Emlyn Jones and Larry Warren this is me. |
ADX files Warrengate Show
This week has been nothing but certifiably insane. Yes the A10 is fake but they say it wasn't Warren. But he still says the reflection is me and that when his account was hacked after he left our house the photos were messed with. He categorically states it was my partner who hacked his Facebook account.
Ben's protestations HPANWO is Warren a Fraud part 7
It has been established the original A10 photo was as I originally said. Colour and devoid of any other objects. That was faked so how does that explain the fact it was uploaded in 2013 or 2014, spotted by Mick Sayer and then by someone else, R Martens, if the other photo which clearly shows Warrens reflection and his own living room behind him, complete with his own paintings hanging on the walls. All files are in his Larry's Photos file on my partners laptop. How does he come to the conclusion that we/I messed with that photo? Nothing about his narrative makes sense. It is HIS reflection.
Also we have the issue that Gary Heseltine is apparently trying to take credit for busting the A10 photograph. The one I said was fake, the one he said wasn't. I spoke to Barry Greenwood, no one believes that he would speak to me and no one else! That doesn't say anything about me at all but everything about the people thinking I would hoax those emails.
Barry spoke to Gary, Gary announced after investigating, the photo is fake but it wasn't Warren who faked it. Greenwood is wrong... Warren would know if he took the photos or not and obviously he is as honest as the day is long. Only Warren was still on his way back from Germany so how could he have when he states in LAEG they had to walk back to base, had a coke in the Cherry Tree Pub and had to walk back to base only just making it in time for duty and hadn't heard anything about the previous incidents. Screw the fact that it was taken in 1985 on his honeymoon. Anyway he will be including it in the next edition of UFO "Truth" magazine.
So he goes to see a solicitor and tells him we are damaging his non existent business. He then gives Ben emlyn Jones our private correspondence and also gives a statement to be issues on his behalf to Heidi who begs for ben to post the letters on her page. He didn't obviously, he kept them for himself but Larry shared them with the rest of the world. They claim they were redacted when sent, I pointed out immediately that the easiest way to prove that is to send a screenshot of the original message containing the redacted letters. They did not oblige.
After complaining to his solicitor about this illegal stunt, his solicitor blocked any communication with any of the people involved even though some would like to represent themselves at this stage. Nope.. He's pulled up the drawbridge. At the same time as him doing that Warren goes balls out again with his vicious verbiage and further death threats. Yes, we have another murder fantasy from him people! This time involving heavy chains, concrete and a river. I am sure that was approved by his solicitor. It seems that Warren thinks he is above every law in the land.
Problem he has is that May Pang said that sketch was fake. I looked deeper and found other evidence of forgeries and criminal sales. Everything I find that links back to him he says was stolen. The stolen Stevie Ray Vaughan guitar for example;
In
February 2016 a sunburst Fender Stratocaster was advertised by Guernsey's
auction house in New York City that is purported to have belonged to Stevie Ray
Vaughan. Many sources on the internet reported it sold for $100,000, but
Guernsey's director has stated it was not sold. The guitar is
allegedly signed by Vaughan in gold pen and dated "'90," has
"SRV" stickers on the upper horn and "Cobras" stickers on
the pick guard. Because this guitar has been on the market several times since
1995, I believe I should publish my research on the guitar as a public service
so that others interested in this guitar may reach their own conclusion whether
Stevie Ray Vaughan owned or signed this guitar.
In my
OPINION, and to the best of my knowledge:
This
guitar was first sold by Christie's auction house in 1995, having been
consigned on behalf of Larry Warren, an author of a book regarding his
encounter with an allegedly alien spacecraft in a forest in the UK. Larry
Warren claimed to have obtained the guitar directly from Stevie Ray Vaughan.
1. There
is no photographic proof that Stevie Ray Vaughan ever touched this guitar or
one similarly customized in appearance.
2. A
review of credible equipment inventories and appraisals created by or on behalf
of Stevie Ray Vaughan reveals no evidence that he ever owned this guitar.
3. The
photocopy of a letter allegedly penned by Vaughan does not appear to me to be
his handwriting. In my opinion someone merely copied his tendency to write in
all caps and make his E's like backwards 3's. A forensic handwriting specialist
(not a common for-hire "authenticator") should examine the document.
4. Singer
Paul Ray of the Cobras showed the letter to Jimmie Vaughan who told him the
letter was probably not Stevie's handwriting.
5. The
statement in the letter is that Stevie acquired the guitar from singer Paul Ray
of the Cobras. Paul Ray denied this in writing in 1997.
6. The
letter allegedly in Stevie's handwriting appears to have been altered since
1995 in that the name "Paul Ray" has been somewhat obscured, while in
1995 it was as clear as all the other writing. If altered, it was done after Paul
Ray revealed in writing that the statement about him was completely false.
7. The
letter allegedly in Stevie's handwriting refers to having played the guitar on
stage on July 3, 1990, in Vermont. In researching this guitar, Warren made
repeated assurances to me in 1995-96 that the guitar had been played for two
songs on stage by Vaughan on that night, and that he knew photos had been taken
to prove it. He promised to obtain and provide the photos to me. In 1997 Warren
finally admitted to me on the phone that Stevie did NOT play the guitar that
night, and there would never be any photographic proof. Thus, the two primary
verifiable facts in the letter have been proven false.
8. If
Stevie had used the guitar on stage, René Martinez, Stevie's guitar tech, would
have known, but René told me he had never seen this guitar.
9. A note
that originally circulated as provenance with the guitar in 1995 was allegedly
written by René Martinez, but he told me he did not write the note. After
Martinez denied any knowledge of the guitar, the note has apparently
disappeared.
10. The
handwritten note does not appear to match a sample of René Martinez'
handwriting that is in my possession.
11. In
1995 the inside of the neck cavity bore a piece of tape with "R.
Martinez" written on it, implying that René Martinez had worked on the
guitar or set it up for playing on stage. Martinez told me had had never
worked on this guitar and had not placed the tape there.
12. A
note accompanying the 1995 sale "witnessed" the transfer of the
guitar from Stevie to Larry Warren, and had two signatures in addition to
Warren's. That note also seems to have disappeared since 1997. Warren
could not provide me with any contact information for the first
"witness," Mike Howe. Whether that person exists or was a made-up
name by a forger is unknown.
13. When
contacted, the other "witness," Pete Jones, refused to verify the
facts to me. When contacted by Christie's auction house, Jones apparently did
not provide any credible evidence that Stevie Ray Vaughan had owned or given
the guitar to Larry Warren, because Christie's cancelled the sale.
14. The
note now accompanying the guitar, allegedly written by Cesar
Diaz (now deceased) is dated 1999, four years after the guitar was originally
sold. Even if Diaz examined or set up a guitar for some unidentified person in
1999, there is nothing in the receipt that suggests, much less proves, the
ownership history of the guitar.
15. The
note allegedly from Cesar Diaz appears to have had the customer's name removed
and then the page photocopied to help conceal the alteration. (I have not
personally examined this note.)
16. The
last "9" in the date of the Diaz note does not look like the other
9's. Did someone change the date to make it more difficult to trace the origin
of the note?
17. The
note allegedly from Cesar Diaz does not refer to any guitar by serial number or
other identifying characteristic, and could have been for repair to any of the
thousands of Stevie Ray Vaughan tribute Stratocasters made by Fender since
1992.
18. Cesar
Diaz worked on amplifiers for Stevie Ray Vaughan. Guitars were tended by René
Martinez.
19. A
Lyra guitar originating from Larry Warren was sold by a different auction house
with a very similar handwritten letter attributed to Stevie Ray Vaughan. The
guitar was advertised with a photograph of Stevie holding a Danelectro guitar,
with the Lyra guitar leaning against his chair or leg. The original, published
photograph does not have the second guitar in the photo!
20. A
black hat bearing a signature similar to the one on the Fender
"Cobras" guitar was sold at another auction in the 1990's. After the
auction it was determined that it had been made (and therefore signed by a
forger) AFTER Stevie died, and the sale was rescinded. I was told the hat
originated from Larry Warren.
21. I am
not aware of any instance of Stevie Ray Vaughan giving away a valuable guitar
such as this one, much less writing a note saying, "You have my permission
to sell this guitar."
22. In
1997, after being presented with some of this information, Christie's rescinded
the auction sale of 1995 and returned 100% of the buyer's money.
23. I
made the most of the above information available to Guernsey's director and attorney
approximately one week before the auction. After reviewing the information,
Guernsey's director stated that they would not sell the guitar.
The above constitute my opinions. I do not have any ownership, financial
or other interest in this guitar. I do not know who consigned the guitar to
Guernsey's and have no reason or intention to harm anyone's reputation. Your
conclusions about the authenticity of the guitar may be different than my own. (Name and personal information withheld on request. Identity to be revealed to the police only as stated in the show)
However he states it was stolen from him and he wants it back! He should really contact the FBI about that. He also states the Garcia painting was stolen from him even though it was in the exact same auction lot as the rest of his belongings and was sold with other items of his. The rest of the items listed in the lot that remained unsold were sent back to him while he lived with us and we have the evidence of this as has already been shown in previous blogs time and again. By the way, when the Garcia family release a painting of Garcia's they make an announcement about it. It's a big deal.
So here are the latest screenshots of his illegal behaviour which he seems to think is going to get us into court and not himself.
So here are the latest screenshots of his illegal behaviour which he seems to think is going to get us into court and not himself.
 |
| A BLOKE with a chain on HIS right arm... Like this? |
 |
| A BLOKE with GREY HAIR and GLASSES... Like this? |
 |
| Note the painting second in at the bottom. |
 |
| This is the painting. Painted by Warren. Note the signature it matches the one on the Garcia BEFORE it changed. |
For the latest news and views on this matter please check out Issue 6 of Outerlimits Magazine. There are several articles on current events surrounding RFI among other interesting things. It is free, it's monthly and you can grab your copy here Outerlimits Magazine
Friday, 3 February 2017
Gary Heseltine releases statement. A10 photo IS a fake. Warren says "It wasn't me"
In late January, 2017 I put out a magazine statement saying that Larry Warren had found the original A10 colour print.
I stated that a 600 dpi scan should be taken of the original print and that either the original or the high-res scan should be sent to the renowned photo analyst Bruce Maccabee as he had been involved in the earlier analysis of the enhanced A10 image produced by Richard Martens in 2014.
In recent days I became aware of a statement made by Barry Greenwood, the respected US co-author of the book, Clear Intent, which had included several pages devoted to the Rendlesham Forest incident. He stated that he had a set of original scan images that Larry Warren had given to his co-author Larry Fawcett showing pictures of the forest, that he believed were taken during Larry’s honeymoon in 1985.
Given the fact that I had reported the A10 story in UFO Truth magazine (issue 10) I feel a sense of involvement to investigate the story to its conclusion.
In recent days, I have been in direct communication with Barry Greenwood to try and clarify the origins of the A10 image.
As a result, he sent me 9 sets of 3 photos – 27 pictures in total (all at the 600 dpi resolution) which he stated were Larry’s pictures of the forest taken during his honeymoon in the summer of 1985.
These photos included the A10 image which people are familiar with.
When I examined the high-resolution image he supplied of the A10 photo it immediately became clear to me that it was by far the best quality image of the A10 picture I had ever seen and that it did not show anomalous images above the aircraft.
BACKGROUND
If the high-quality image does not contain any anomalous image then it begs the question where did Robert Marten’s get his A10 picture from in which to make his enhancements?
Martens stated that he had copied the picture from a photo album that was on Larry Warren’s original FB page.
Note: Larry Warren will state that his original FB page was hacked in the summer of 2015 and he lost access to all of the photos contained in the albums on his page. That hacking forced him to create another FB identity profile page in the name of Lawrence Warren.
Larry Warren’s account in brief is that he took the A10 image on the morning of the 27th December, 1980 using a Keystone 110 camera and that he’d taken a few random shots of the base/forest before going into Ipswich with several friends and then returning to the base later in the day so he could go onto shift later that night – a night that would become the 3rd night of UFO activity at the base.
For over 30 years Larry Warren had paid no attention whatsoever to the A10 image because he had never seen anything other than the A10 aircraft and the forest in the picture.
However, that all changed in the summer of 2014 when he was contacted by Mick Sayer on FB who told that he believed there was ‘something’ above the A10 aircraft. Then he was contacted by Robert Martens who sent him what he said was an enhanced image of the strange object seen above the A10 (and supposedly derived from the A10 image in Larry Warren’s original FB album).
This enhanced image clearly showed a structured-like object above the A10.
Larry was amazed by this ‘find’ and told me about it which led me to write the article that appeared on it in issue 10. At the end of the article I stated that there was a need for the original negative to be found to confirm the anomalies seen above the A10.
TWO ACCOUNTS OF THE ORIGINS OF THE A10 PHOTO?
Barry Greenwood believes that the high-quality image of the A10 is from summer 1985 whilst Larry Warren maintains that it was taken on December 27th, 1980.
WithIn the 9 sets of 3 images that Barry Greenwood sent me there were several that contained images of a man and a woman walking around the forest and wearing light clothing and not carrying any coats. One of the sets also showed a picture of Larry Warren himself wearing a light cardigan type top and not carrying any coat.
The light clothing and lack of coats appears to be consistent with them having been taken during spring/summer period and do not appear to have been taken during mid-winter and thus appears to be consistent with Barry Greenwood’s belief that they were taken during the summer of 1985 whilst Larry Warren was on his honeymoon in the UK.
REALITY CHECK
Only one person can be right? Was the A10 image taken in 1980 or in 1985?
How can the BG ‘original’ A10 image show no anomaly whilst the LW ‘original’ print appears to show at least one anomalous image?
Ultimately as Barry Greenwood suggests in his email to me there is a need to examine the original batch of negatives for both the Bentwaters series and Larry Warren’s honeymoon photos, however, as far as I am aware, the negatives for both sets cannot be found and almost certainly after several decades are unlikely ever to be found.
I want to add one point on the A10 date controversy especially in light of the high resolution image supplied by Barry Greenwood - If the A10 picture was taken during the summer of 1985 how come the ground ferns which are everywhere in the forest are brown in colour?
During spring and summer the ferns are predominantly green and litter the ground extensively. I can attest to this as I have visited Rendlesham Forest in the summer on several occasions.
I find the colour of the ferns in the foreground of the photo being BROWN to be a very strong indicator that the A10 photo had been taken in December 1980 as Larry Warren has always stated and not in 1985.
INVESTIGATION
Given the BG images I went back to Larry Warren for an explanation. This was his response sent to me today on Wednesday 1st February 2017,
“Gary...............Larry Fawcett attended my wedding. When I got back I GAVE him and his wife Lois some pictures of our visit to LONDON.... Cin and I went to Ipswich one day and to Bentwaters.........the airman I don't recall his name...........yes, some pictures ARE of the place with my wife in them.
The A 10 picture follows right after the main gate alert photo as found in our book...........has ZERO to do with 85....
In 85 F15s were the aircraft at BW.........
When Fawcett died Lois GAVE Greenwood ALL of LFs archives including photos....I had provided the A 10 picture to LF with others for the Japense to use on pre shows before I went to Japan in 1984 and it and other service related shots were used by the Japanese in a 1984 TV show in Tokyo.........of course I had no idea what was in the shot...........ANY negatives are long gone....i.e. the 110 ASA negs........due to moves, a major flood at my sisters in the 1990s etc. Hope this helps cheers L
*Note – this has had some of the grammer/spelling corrected for easier reading.
I have checked the records for Betwaters and at least one squadron of A10s were still operational from Bentwaters until the late 80s so that information does not add to the evidence either way.
CONCLUSION
These developments do cast some doubt as to the origin of the A10 photo especially the year it was taken but without the negatives I don’t think we will ever know the definitive answer.
Given the discovery of the relevant negatives being highly unlikely I believe that the colour of the ferns shown in the foreground of the A10 image i.e. brown, offers the most compelling circumstantial evidence that the picture was taken in December 1980.
As for the anomalous images found in 2014 Larry cannot offer an explanation as to how Robert Martens managed to enhance Larry’s FB A10 image to the level he attained.
I myself have tried to enhance the image above the A10 but cannot get anywhere near the structured-like shape that Martens produced and the level of detail he attained is a mystery to me.
One thing I am pretty certain of is that the original BG print of the A10 does not contain any anomalous images yet I cannot think of one logical reason why someone – Larry Warren - would go to the trouble of fabricating a hoax image, placing it on FB in 2011 in the blind hope that some unknown eagle-eyed person on FB might spot it and thus change history!
Bearing in mind that it is a matter of public record that Larry Warren has never claimed to have seen any anomalous image (s) in his original print during the decades he has had it in his possession until he was made aware of an anomaly in 2014 on FB by Mick Sayer.
In effect this renders the Martens enhancement picture to be a mystery in itself and should be considered unsound in terms of proving that there was a genuine anomalous object above the A10.
Personally having looked at all the evidence I do not believe that there was one.
As I have always said that the evidence falls where it falls and I will not back away from publishing the facts, whether I like them or not.
These are the facts as I know them to be.
I want to personally thank Barry Greenwood for his cooperation and for the excellent photos he supplied to me.
FINAL NOTE
On a final note, I want to make this point, these developments do not alter my opinion that Larry Warren was the original witness whistleblower for the RFI and that he was involved in the third night of UFO activity on the base.
His involvement is a matter of public record as a result of the testimonies of both Sergeant Adrian Bustinza, airman Steve Longero and others who place him there and being involved in the 3rd night of activity.
I will be placed this update in the forthcoming issue of UFO Truth Magazine (issue 23).
Gary Heseltine Editor, UFO Truth Magazine
So Warren blames the hack that happened three years after the photo was uploaded, the hack he blames my partner for. The ONLY person that hack ever convenienced is HIM.
So I did do it or my partner did it or that guy did it? Even though Mick Sayer said he noticed it the year before and didn't say anything? Are you shitting us all? WOW.
So do I have a time machine? I can go back in time and mess with his stuff can I?
I've gone DEAF with the thunderous sound of back peddling.
No statement to the effect that you do NOT have proof SC (ME) messed with the A10 picture then? NO YOU HAVEN'T.
Gagging Order Fail By Warren. Shut up! Erm.. No.
Listen to the response to the latest stunt pulled by Warren here Warrengate ADX Files Show Sacha talks to Alyson Dunlop
Larry Warren went to see a solicitor recently. He want's us to stop talking about him in public. Rather than have his documents examined and authenticated with the £600 we amassed for the handwriting analysis, he decided he would go spend some money on having us silenced by the law.
Did he mention his military career, the documents, accusations of stolen valour and being what is called a military imposter (for exaggerating his service and calling himself an Ex Vet) to his Solicitor? NO!
He had us all sent letters telling us for the past 18 months we have been causing damage to his rock memorabilia business. Stop talking about him, remove all mentions of him yadadada, or my client will be forced to take you to court for compensation. For MONEY.
Lets rewind.... 18 months his business has been damaged he says. What business? 18 months? No.... It is exactly 18 months since the Daily Post reported the Lennon sketch is fake as told to them by May Pang in June 2015. So he DID sell it to Kellett then? He has denied that all along even though I knew it, have seen the actual drawing AND found copies of it on my partners laptop. 18 months is June 2015.
BUT I didn't start talking about all of this until February 2016 and my blogs started in 2016 so 18 months is a total lie. But it IS 18 months since May Pang said the sketch was fake. I pointed it out at a later date. So where's May Pang's gagging letter then? I just repeated the news. It's NOT defamation sharing and talking about a newspaper article. We know for a fact he was still on benefits when he sold it. He sold it while living with us.
Warren was on benefits two years ago this month. That was the month he moved in with us. I have a message from me telling him what kind of benefits he might be entitled to. This was when I assumed he had a PTSD diagnosis and I could help him apply for disability as John Burroughs had his own success in proving his health was damaged while in service.
Definitely Tax records should exist, he should be registered as a sole trader etc. Basically... He better have six years worth of evidence of his business existing and he must have been lying when he told us he was in receipt of benefits and pretended to go sign on every other Monday then? So he did have money then because he had a business? Wait? What?! Hmmmm.
So now we are at eighteen months since the sketch he says he didn't own was outed as fake, but that's the start of the damage to his business and it isn't damaging his business because it doesn't exist, I am not sure if I can repeat that enough. I find it very strange he didn't mention his military documents or his public career in any way shape or form. He thinks as a public figure he can make statements and then have them silenced for proving him wrong. Doesn't work like that defamation isn't defamation if it is true. It is the truth.
He sends out the letters banning us from talking about him, yet carries on talking about us through other people after being advised not to talk about me by his own solicitor. Then he sent Ben Emlyn Jones his copies of our letters marked private and confidential and posted them up on Facebook!!! Strutting about "I haven't done anything wrong..." Facebook removed the post. Privacy laws exist. The others want to know how he ended up with their addresses, So does Alyson. has Gary provided them? Data protection laws exist.
 |
| Part of my letter from Warren's solicitor Gary Heseltine's face included. |
They are behaving like a desperate a mess. Ben said they were sent to him redacted, Oh we will just take your word for that then. for all we know he has sent unredacted copies to everyone on planet Earth, after all he set the entire internet on Barry Greenwood and stated he must be living in the woods if he isn't replying. Not he is ignoring a man who set the entire internet on him by requesting everyone email Barry Greenwood in his Is Larry Warren a Fraud HPANWO blog series.
Who redacted them? Warren says computers are witchcraft and celebrated being able to use skype on a radio show. Well done that man, how did he manage to get a BA in communications if he can't spell, type or even Skype? Well we know he didn't, someone asked them and they've never heard of him. The 'other' school in connecticut has NEVER handed out BA's, Someone checked that out too. So someone else redacted them so whatever he says, they were not kept private and confidential and anyone and everyone could have our home addresses now. Whats up with them cries Susan McAllister, warrens ex wife, "The addressed weren't on the letters posted on the net"! Really??
Private and confidential means just that. How would she like it if we started telling people where she lives? Exactly. Shoe on the other foot as a MOTHER. Especially seeing as he keeps referencing me being shot, dealt with NYC style real quiet like, March chapman is mentioned a lot in conversation about me, he shot John Lennon in the street. My house can burn down and you're so fucked, best move...... bless. He has fantasised about me being murdered a lot and all in public. Facebook removed the post.
I am being dramatic worrying about my home and my children am I? No I am not. this is terrorism.
Everything they conjure up is twoddle. Ben accuses me of working with people nobody knows... All new to the scene says Mr Ancient Alien. Erm... No one knows your current tribe either Ben and you don't know because I don't tell you. I love surprises. You just think you know and all you have at best is guess work based on gossip from liars and no, of course I didn't do anything with you (boo-hoo poor baby) I would rather eat my own feet with a napalm dip than do anything with you.
To reiterate; Its a letter from a solicitor based on a lie, of course no one is going to pay attention. It isn't a writ it's a piece of shit. Worthless. Get it? Got it? Good. No business no claim, no woman no cry.
Now the ball is in Warrens court because he now has to provide evidence of this business of his AND prove the damage caused for the past 18 months when its a year in reality. The letter said if you do not comply with this our client will take you to court.
OKAY THEN!
Ever heard of COUNTERCLAIM? Proof of loss is easy. He had the PROBE conference taken from me and cost SPI Scotland and extra £600 and turned up to a venue he was banned from saying in Ben's video of the drive up there "Oh I will be speaking" because he thinks he is bigger than everything. He thinks he can blag his way into and out of anything.
It turns out Gary Heseltine has been stalking my pages and sending Warren the "evidence." He didn't protect himself and remove his name and face from his screenshots though. Neither did the solicitor.. oops!
So with this being harassment that makes it trolling, although really it ought to be called gangstalking, they are all complicit. Gary ought to know this he is an ex policeman right? Oh.. and lucky everyone because Nigel Mortimer has been booked on at UFO Truth, BUFOG and PROBE. You know you do tend to end up being busier when you retire. Am I supposed to be outraged? I don't care. I'm not paying to see him or paying for him.. Knock yourselves out! Misogyny rules KO.
So why did he avoid anything to do with Rendlesham? Why didn't he send John Hanson a letter as promised? Oh... Yeah... Because it highlights his public life which makes a massive difference to being just a guy trying to get along in a dog eat dog world man...?
WHY WOULD HE RATHER SPEND MONEY ON SILENCING US THAN HAVING HIS DOCUMENTS ANALYSED FOR NO PERSONAL COST TO HIMSELF????????????????
So its only a year, the business is fictitious. Truth is not defamation. My toilet roll is worth more than that letter, after flushing. But if he wants to go to court, he can take me to court. We are all up for it. We are not criminals.
So on behalf of Myself, Alyson Dunlop, Ronnie Dugdale, David Young and my new best friend James Welsh it is business as unusual. See you in court Lawrence Patrick Warren.
Oh I almost forgot.. Alyson and I are recording a radio show today, It will be out this coming Saturday. I will post the link here in an update.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)