Gary Heseltine releases statement. A10 photo IS a fake. Warren says "It wasn't me"

Just posted by Gary Heseltine: THE BARRY GREENWOOD PHOTOGRAPHS
 In late January, 2017 I put out a magazine statement saying that Larry Warren had found the original A10 colour print.
 I stated that a 600 dpi scan should be taken of the original print and that either the original or the high-res scan should be sent to the renowned photo analyst Bruce Maccabee as he had been involved in the earlier analysis of the enhanced A10 image produced by Richard Martens in 2014.
 In recent days I became aware of a statement made by Barry Greenwood, the respected US co-author of the book, Clear Intent, which had included several pages devoted to the Rendlesham Forest incident. He stated that he had a set of original scan images that Larry Warren had given to his co-author Larry Fawcett showing pictures of the forest, that he believed were taken during Larry’s honeymoon in 1985.
 Given the fact that I had reported the A10 story in UFO Truth magazine (issue 10) I feel a sense of involvement to investigate the story to its conclusion.
 In recent days, I have been in direct communication with Barry Greenwood to try and clarify the origins of the A10 image.
 As a result, he sent me 9 sets of 3 photos – 27 pictures in total (all at the 600 dpi resolution) which he stated were Larry’s pictures of the forest taken during his honeymoon in the summer of 1985.
 These photos included the A10 image which people are familiar with.
 When I examined the high-resolution image he supplied of the A10 photo it immediately became clear to me that it was by far the best quality image of the A10 picture I had ever seen and that it did not show anomalous images above the aircraft.
 BACKGROUND
 If the high-quality image does not contain any anomalous image then it begs the question where did Robert Marten’s get his A10 picture from in which to make his enhancements?
 Martens stated that he had copied the picture from a photo album that was on Larry Warren’s original FB page.
 Note: Larry Warren will state that his original FB page was hacked in the summer of 2015 and he lost access to all of the photos contained in the albums on his page. That hacking forced him to create another FB identity profile page in the name of Lawrence Warren.
 Larry Warren’s account in brief is that he took the A10 image on the morning of the 27th December, 1980 using a Keystone 110 camera and that he’d taken a few random shots of the base/forest before going into Ipswich with several friends and then returning to the base later in the day so he could go onto shift later that night – a night that would become the 3rd night of UFO activity at the base.
 For over 30 years Larry Warren had paid no attention whatsoever to the A10 image because he had never seen anything other than the A10 aircraft and the forest in the picture.
However, that all changed in the summer of 2014 when he was contacted by Mick Sayer on FB who told that he believed there was ‘something’ above the A10 aircraft. Then he was contacted by Robert Martens who sent him what he said was an enhanced image of the strange object seen above the A10 (and supposedly derived from the A10 image in Larry Warren’s original FB album).
 This enhanced image clearly showed a structured-like object above the A10.
 Larry was amazed by this ‘find’ and told me about it which led me to write the article that appeared on it in issue 10. At the end of the article I stated that there was a need for the original negative to be found to confirm the anomalies seen above the A10.
 TWO ACCOUNTS OF THE ORIGINS OF THE A10 PHOTO?
 Barry Greenwood believes that the high-quality image of the A10 is from summer 1985 whilst Larry Warren maintains that it was taken on December 27th, 1980.
 WithIn the 9 sets of 3 images that Barry Greenwood sent me there were several that contained images of a man and a woman walking around the forest and wearing light clothing and not carrying any coats. One of the sets also showed a picture of Larry Warren himself wearing a light cardigan type top and not carrying any coat.
 The light clothing and lack of coats appears to be consistent with them having been taken during spring/summer period and do not appear to have been taken during mid-winter and thus appears to be consistent with Barry Greenwood’s belief that they were taken during the summer of 1985 whilst Larry Warren was on his honeymoon in the UK.
 REALITY CHECK
 Only one person can be right? Was the A10 image taken in 1980 or in 1985?
 How can the BG ‘original’ A10 image show no anomaly whilst the LW ‘original’ print appears to show at least one anomalous image?
 Ultimately as Barry Greenwood suggests in his email to me there is a need to examine the original batch of negatives for both the Bentwaters series and Larry Warren’s honeymoon photos, however, as far as I am aware, the negatives for both sets cannot be found and almost certainly after several decades are unlikely ever to be found.
 I want to add one point on the A10 date controversy especially in light of the high resolution image supplied by Barry Greenwood - If the A10 picture was taken during the summer of 1985 how come the ground ferns which are everywhere in the forest are brown in colour?
 During spring and summer the ferns are predominantly green and litter the ground extensively. I can attest to this as I have visited Rendlesham Forest in the summer on several occasions.
 I find the colour of the ferns in the foreground of the photo being BROWN to be a very strong indicator that the A10 photo had been taken in December 1980 as Larry Warren has always stated and not in 1985.
 INVESTIGATION
 Given the BG images I went back to Larry Warren for an explanation. This was his response sent to me today on Wednesday 1st February 2017,
“Gary...............Larry Fawcett attended my wedding. When I got back I GAVE him and his wife Lois some pictures of our visit to LONDON.... Cin and I went to Ipswich one day and to Bentwaters.........the airman I don't recall his name...........yes, some pictures ARE of the place with my wife in them.
 The A 10 picture follows right after the main gate alert photo as found in our book...........has ZERO to do with 85....
 In 85 F15s were the aircraft at BW.........
 When Fawcett died Lois GAVE Greenwood ALL of LFs archives including photos....I had provided the A 10 picture to LF with others for the Japense to use on pre shows before I went to Japan in 1984 and it and other service related shots were used by the Japanese in a 1984 TV show in Tokyo.........of course I had no idea what was in the shot...........ANY negatives are long gone....i.e. the 110 ASA negs........due to moves, a major flood at my sisters in the 1990s etc. Hope this helps cheers L
 *Note – this has had some of the grammer/spelling corrected for easier reading.
 I have checked the records for Betwaters and at least one squadron of A10s were still operational from Bentwaters until the late 80s so that information does not add to the evidence either way.
 CONCLUSION
 These developments do cast some doubt as to the origin of the A10 photo especially the year it was taken but without the negatives I don’t think we will ever know the definitive answer.
 Given the discovery of the relevant negatives being highly unlikely I believe that the colour of the ferns shown in the foreground of the A10 image i.e. brown, offers the most compelling circumstantial evidence that the picture was taken in December 1980.
 As for the anomalous images found in 2014 Larry cannot offer an explanation as to how Robert Martens managed to enhance Larry’s FB A10 image to the level he attained.
 I myself have tried to enhance the image above the A10 but cannot get anywhere near the structured-like shape that Martens produced and the level of detail he attained is a mystery to me.
 One thing I am pretty certain of is that the original BG print of the A10 does not contain any anomalous images yet I cannot think of one logical reason why someone – Larry Warren - would go to the trouble of fabricating a hoax image, placing it on FB in 2011 in the blind hope that some unknown eagle-eyed person on FB might spot it and thus change history!
 Bearing in mind that it is a matter of public record that Larry Warren has never claimed to have seen any anomalous image (s) in his original print during the decades he has had it in his possession until he was made aware of an anomaly in 2014 on FB by Mick Sayer.
 In effect this renders the Martens enhancement picture to be a mystery in itself and should be considered unsound in terms of proving that there was a genuine anomalous object above the A10.
 Personally having looked at all the evidence I do not believe that there was one.
 As I have always said that the evidence falls where it falls and I will not back away from publishing the facts, whether I like them or not.
 These are the facts as I know them to be.
 I want to personally thank Barry Greenwood for his cooperation and for the excellent photos he supplied to me.
 FINAL NOTE
 On a final note, I want to make this point, these developments do not alter my opinion that Larry Warren was the original witness whistleblower for the RFI and that he was involved in the third night of UFO activity on the base.
 His involvement is a matter of public record as a result of the testimonies of both Sergeant Adrian Bustinza, airman Steve Longero and others who place him there and being involved in the 3rd night of activity.
 I will be placed this update in the forthcoming issue of UFO Truth Magazine (issue 23).
 Gary Heseltine Editor, UFO Truth Magazine


So Warren blames the hack that happened three years after the photo was uploaded, the hack he blames my partner for. The ONLY person that hack ever convenienced is HIM.

So I did do it or my partner did it or that guy did it? Even though Mick Sayer said he noticed it the year before and didn't say anything? Are you shitting us all? WOW.

So do I have a time machine? I can go back in time and mess with his stuff can I?

I've gone DEAF with the thunderous sound of back peddling.

No statement to the effect that you do NOT have proof SC (ME) messed with the A10 picture then? NO YOU HAVEN'T.

Gagging Order Fail By Warren. Shut up! Erm.. No.

Listen to the response to the latest stunt pulled by Warren here Warrengate ADX Files Show Sacha talks to Alyson Dunlop


Larry Warren went to see a solicitor recently. He want's us to stop talking about him in public. Rather than have his documents examined and authenticated with the £600 we amassed for the handwriting analysis, he decided he would go spend some money on having us silenced by the law.

Did he mention his military career, the documents, accusations of stolen valour and being what is called a military imposter (for exaggerating his service and calling himself an Ex Vet) to his Solicitor? NO!

He had us all sent letters telling us for the past 18 months we have been causing damage to his rock memorabilia business. Stop talking about him, remove all mentions of him yadadada, or my client will be forced to take you to court for compensation. For MONEY.

Lets rewind.... 18 months his business has been damaged he says. What business? 18 months? No.... It is exactly 18 months since the Daily Post reported the Lennon sketch is fake as told to them  by May Pang in June 2015. So he DID sell it to Kellett then? He has denied that all along even though I knew it, have seen the actual drawing AND found copies of it on my partners laptop. 18 months is June 2015.

BUT I didn't start talking about all of this until February 2016 and my blogs started in 2016 so 18 months is a total lie. But it IS 18 months since May Pang said the sketch was fake. I pointed it out at a later date. So where's May Pang's gagging letter then? I just repeated the news. It's NOT defamation sharing and talking about a newspaper article. We know for a fact he was still on benefits when he sold it. He sold it while living with us.

Warren was on benefits two years ago this month. That was the month he moved in with us. I have a message from me telling him what kind of benefits he might be entitled to. This was when I assumed he had a PTSD diagnosis and I could help him apply for disability as John Burroughs had his own success in proving his health was damaged while in service.

I also had a curious message from Peter (below) asking me what diagnosis Larry had, specifically. I replied "I have been telling him to go to the doctor and tell him about his PTSD". Larry, a grown man who says he runs his own business needed me to sort his benefits out. When he lived with us he was on ESA for a bad back but was thrown off it the week he moved in with us and put on Job Seekers Allowance. Kilroy says.. What? No OPTI/RET/BURN, PTSD or heart issues? No. Why is Peter asking ME? Hasn't he known him 30 years?

 In November 2015 he sent me "You're so fucked best move....... bless" which is FIVE months after the daily Post article and only fourteen months ago. Then there is the massive factor that HIS BUSINESS DOES NOT EXIST. However we have proof of his sales going all the way back to 1995. More recently we have a lot of proof from 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015. Tens of thousands of pounds.  So his business better check out eh? VAT records possibly, he has earned enough.

Definitely Tax records should exist, he should be registered as a sole trader etc. Basically... He better have  six years worth of evidence of his business existing and he must have been lying when he told us he was in receipt of benefits and pretended to go sign on every other Monday then? So he did have money then because he had a business? Wait? What?! Hmmmm.

So now we are at eighteen months since the sketch he says he didn't own was outed as fake, but that's the start of the damage to his business and it isn't damaging his business because it doesn't exist, I am not sure if I can repeat that enough. I find it very strange he didn't mention his military documents or his public career in any way shape or form. He thinks as a public figure he can make statements and then have them silenced for proving him wrong. Doesn't work like that defamation isn't defamation if it is true. It is the truth.

He sends out the letters banning us from talking about him, yet carries on talking about us through other people after being advised not to talk about me by his own solicitor. Then he sent Ben Emlyn Jones his copies of our letters marked private and confidential and posted them up on Facebook!!! Strutting about "I haven't done anything wrong..." Facebook removed the post. Privacy laws exist. The others want to know how he ended up with their addresses, So does Alyson. has Gary provided them? Data protection laws exist.

Part of my letter from Warren's solicitor Gary Heseltine's face included. 

They are behaving like a desperate a mess. Ben said they were sent to him redacted, Oh we will just take your word for that then. for all we know he has sent unredacted copies to everyone on planet Earth, after all he set the entire internet on Barry Greenwood and stated he must be living in the woods if he isn't replying. Not he is ignoring a man who set the entire internet on him by requesting everyone email Barry Greenwood in his Is Larry Warren a Fraud HPANWO blog series.

Who redacted them? Warren says computers are witchcraft and celebrated being able to use skype on a radio show.  Well done that man, how did he manage to get a BA in communications if he can't spell, type or even Skype? Well we know he didn't, someone asked them and they've never heard of him. The 'other' school in connecticut has NEVER handed out BA's, Someone checked that out too. So someone else redacted them so whatever he says, they were not kept private and confidential and anyone and everyone could have our home addresses now. Whats up with them cries Susan McAllister, warrens ex wife, "The addressed weren't on the letters posted on the net"! Really??

Private and confidential means just that. How would she like it if we started telling people where she lives? Exactly. Shoe on the other foot as a MOTHER. Especially seeing as he keeps referencing me being shot, dealt with NYC style real quiet like, March chapman is mentioned a lot in conversation about me, he shot John Lennon in the street. My house can burn down and you're so fucked, best move...... bless. He has fantasised about me being murdered a lot and all in public. Facebook removed the post.

I am being dramatic worrying about my home and my children am I? No I am not. this is terrorism.

Everything they conjure up is twoddle. Ben accuses me of working with people nobody knows... All new to the scene says Mr Ancient Alien. Erm... No one knows your current tribe either Ben and you don't know because I don't tell you. I love surprises. You just think you know and all you have at best is guess work based on gossip from liars and no, of course I didn't do anything with you (boo-hoo poor baby) I would rather eat my own feet with a napalm dip than do anything with you.

To reiterate; Its a letter from a solicitor based on a lie, of course no one is going to pay attention. It isn't a writ it's a piece of shit. Worthless. Get it? Got it? Good. No business no claim, no woman no cry.

Now the ball is in Warrens court because he now has to provide evidence of this business of his AND prove the damage caused for the past 18 months when its a year in reality. The letter said if you do not comply with this our client will take you to court.

OKAY THEN!

Ever heard of COUNTERCLAIM? Proof of loss is easy. He had the PROBE conference taken from me and cost SPI Scotland and extra £600 and turned up to a venue he was banned from saying in Ben's video of the drive up there "Oh I will be speaking" because he thinks he is bigger than everything. He thinks he can blag his way into and out of anything.

It turns out Gary Heseltine has been stalking my pages and sending Warren the "evidence."  He didn't protect himself and remove his name and face from his screenshots though. Neither did the solicitor.. oops!

So with this being harassment that makes it trolling, although really it ought to be called gangstalking, they are all complicit. Gary ought to know this he is an ex policeman right? Oh.. and lucky everyone because Nigel Mortimer has been booked on at UFO Truth, BUFOG and PROBE. You know you do tend to end up being busier when you retire. Am I supposed to be outraged? I don't care. I'm not paying to see him or paying for him.. Knock yourselves out! Misogyny rules KO.

So why did he avoid anything to do with Rendlesham? Why didn't he send John Hanson a letter as promised? Oh... Yeah... Because it highlights his public life which makes a massive difference to being just a guy trying to get along in a dog eat dog world man...?

WHY WOULD HE RATHER SPEND MONEY ON SILENCING US THAN HAVING HIS DOCUMENTS ANALYSED FOR NO PERSONAL COST TO HIMSELF????????????????

So its only a year, the business is fictitious. Truth is not defamation.  My toilet roll is worth more than that letter, after flushing. But if he wants to go to court, he can take me to court. We are all up for it. We are not criminals.

So on behalf of Myself, Alyson Dunlop, Ronnie Dugdale, David Young and my new best friend James Welsh it is business as unusual. See you in court Lawrence Patrick Warren.

Oh I almost forgot.. Alyson and I are recording a radio show today, It will be out this coming Saturday. I will post the link here in an update.

Sacha Christie and Nick Pope faked the photos in 2014.

According to camp Warren.

Last night it was brought to my attention that the people in Warrens circle of unwitting deceit are saying that I faked the A10 photograph. Not quite sure how that works seeing as warren uploaded the version himself after Mick sayer found the ufos in it in 2014. Pretty sure that was the year. Before he moved in with us, before he uploaded anything onto my partners laptop. BEFORE anything out of the ordinary became apparent.

Various people were zooming in on the UFOs and discovered the reflection of a camera lens. something I have pointed out MANY times in various photographs of Warrens. I have said before he takes photos of photos. His Yoko Ono photo was a photo of a photo. Now I noticed something else about the Yoko photo.. a dirty misty patch in the top left.

Camera lense in center. 

Misty dirty corner. Photo behind glass. Trademark Warren.

But that misty corner is a massive problem for me because of this photo Warren posted as another one of his UFO photos. Taken DURING the events in the forest in 1980 according to him. But actually he first told Georgina Bruni in You Can't Tell The People, that a guy called Mike took them and gave them to him and he held onto them for 19 years!!! Until he handed them to Georgina. After one week of handing them over, he called her and told her, he had taken them and then went into a long story and that he had smuggled them in a German Stein from his trip to Germany that he also told her he never went on.

UFO Photo

Actual image found in Warrens photos on the laptop he used for four months while staying with us for just three weeks. cough.

So....

An upload by Warren of the image with camera reflection saying i can shove this image up my ass.

Later version with bottom half and no camera lens but all kinds of weird shading and shadows. He is also only in reality a few inches taller than Yoko. Not an entire 12 inches. He would be around 6' 2" but in reality he is about 5'7 maybe at a push 5' 8''

Just Sayin......

Nuff said?

Pass the napalm.

Barry Greenwood issues a statement. Warrens latest A10 photograph is not original.

2015 version of the A10 photograph taken 28th December 1980 according to Larry warren

In my previous blog Larry Warrens A10 UFO Photograph is Irrefutably a Genuine Fake. I explained all the issues I had found with the photograph. Shortly afterwards a very badly informed Ben Emlyn Jones wrote a blog castigating my analysis and proffering his own opinion. He had one photograph to base his conclusions and and he didn't have Barry Greenwood to consult with. Not that he even knows who he is. He keeps mentioning Larry's laptop in his blog. Nothing was left here of Larrys. He used my partners laptop for the four months he was here. He used it as his own and loaded all of his photographs onto it. He was thrown out some months later we didn't even realise they were there until we went looking through his internet history for other reasons. But conspiracy theories rage!

As part of Ben Emlyn Jones special investigation he offered his own explanation of the photographs which is hilarious to me, considering the amount of evidence I have and considering the standard of this ongoing investigation. He also demands to know who Barry Greenwood really is and calls for the internet to get a hold of him Nice... Set the internet on a man in his 70's way to go Ben. Why didn't you just try finding our his email address and write to him yourself? Release the flying monkeys, Ben has a right to know.

Ben's wildly inaccurate blog  The amended version that is. He does that a lot. Gets things wrong and alters them without noting the edit for the reader. So when originally they thought they saw my reflection in the image of the photo of the photo.. trademark Warren... It's now evolved into it looks like Nick Pope in the reflection... short grey spikey hair and glasses perhaps? A bit like Warren? this is just so ridiculous, and Warren is letting Ben generate these ridiculous explanations. Well, it's not like I haven't said it before, I said he would do it to SPI Scotland and he did.

Here are some of the images they have produced to prove it was me or Nick.. Only I recognise the chain, I recognise the camera and I recognise the hairline. You will have to squint a bit, these images are trying to enhance the reflection in the photo. Pretty good work I have to say! Very helpful indeed!

Hairline matches the reflection

But if you mirror the image with the camera lens reflection on it, you can see that it says Nikon.

Nikon Camera.

Larrys files. Look at the dates for both of them. 

As soon as I read what he'd written in his blog I wrote to Barry who a really real person, he really is called Barry and really is THE Barry Greenwood, author of Clear Intent. That book was the first comprehensive book of interviews and documentation along with the story of the Rendlesham Forest incidents and as I have said before, I was sent all of Barry's research material. Warren knows this is true. IF he has seen anything I have presented recently, he knows it's true, yet he allows and probably encourages Ben to go forth an be wrong in the name of Warren. He did it to me! He'd known me for nine years and he did it to me. He is doing it to everyone. He never speaks for himself, he has others do it for him while he hides behind them and then his computer screen attacking everyone while accusing everyone of hiding behind their computer screens. He still says it. I said I would go to the SPI conference and ask him a question, face to face, not behind a screen... Well, we all know how that ended after his threat to put my windpipe through my spine if I did. If Ben ever questions Larry in any meaningful way, Warren will turn on him in an instant, just as he did with his friend and Co Author Peter Robbins, and myself and anyone else who has dared to say anything I say is a valid point that obviously just needs a simple explanation... No. It never is ok to question anything at all.

Barry responded to me with a statement.

I have shared all of my findings with Barry and have checked and double checked the facts. Those facts are that the A10 photograph was taken on Warren's honeymoon in 1985 and has been tampered with. Ben suggests that the tampering was done by myself. I deny that completely and have shown every step of my thought processes and presented evidence by the bucket load.

But this is where the next twist is being fed into the drama. The twist that I have generated every bit of false evidence myself and by golly are certain people going to prove it. I don't know where it started but nobody has tried to stop it. The story is that I faked the photos. I also faked the John Lennon photo for laugh one night with Warren and apparently his ex wife has confirmed this. For starters, just no.. He stated categorically he was his friend, the photo is real and even went as far as saying he met him when he was a bodyguard for many stars in some blub published by Cameo Auction house and published in NME. John Lennon died in 1980. Warren was just 19.

Secondly, whats the story behind it and her knowing it was a joint moment of fun? Was she here too? Why then has she supported him all through his it's real phase into now saying I did it phase. Did she even say that? Was the BUFOG member lying? No one has countered this with anything. No one has tried to stop another lie forming and it has begun to spread between the few people still listening to them and hide behind fake names on their profiles!!

Then there is the new story about the Green fake Jerry Garcia painting he sold through Special Auction Services. He said it was stolen. Ok.. So... It was stolen and then sold in the same auction house as his other items a year later? One of which can be seen being pulled out of a box with the auction house's own tape on it. Stolen but sold in the same auction house his own items were sold. It was put on the Special Auction services page as sold for £8,000 and Alan Pritchard, the man Warren accused of stealing his stuff, liked the post. I communicated with Alan and Special Auction Services while having Warren's items returned. Another friend also involved themselves, he wanted to remain anonymous but Warren has blurted out who it was and handed all the credit to him making it look like it was nothing to do with me. I have already produced the emails in an earlier post. But then he tries to tie it into another auction ''bust'' that happened in 2011. He insists he gave evidence to put them away but in fact he only used them to sell his items and they were jailed in 2011. This painting was sold in 2013. He also stated that he was there at Reading Crown Court where they were sentenced. Only they were sentenced in Berkshire and were investigated by the National Trading Standards who do not require civilian witnesses because they do everything under cover. He was not part of the investigation, he was part of the problem that started the investigation.

So after this horror of a time with Cameo he decides to go to the auction house one of the auctioneers from Cameo went to work. If you had been ripped off by a company would you follow one of it's employee's and use them again? Well it seems that special auction services have been noticed by National Trading Standards due to the complaints of another person who see's that they sell items grossly under value which then sell again for one hundred times their purchase price. It's all over their facebook page in visitor posts. From the content you will see it's nothing to do with Warren and so it definitely isn't me. Unless of course Warren has now branched out into selling fancy crockery.

Auction house version with alleged Garcia signature

Warrens version as found on my partners computer (properties etc in another blog) which has LW signature mark. 

It is being said that the auction house version isn't even the same as the Warren version. Well when I looked on their site the image had been reversed and flipped. Set that right and it matches every tiny detail perfectly. I must have sat and painted this in great detail and years ago too and then somehow warren had the real one and it got stolen by someone and sold by SAS. How stupid do I think he is? Immeasurably so.

All points touched upon here have been evidenced in previous blogs. I am considering publishing the 80 pages of evidence of sales, and all of his memorabilia. Someone pointed out I should publish the items he has so that people can be aware of them. He has items if accepted as real would fetch a Million English pounds. The genuine items have sold for that amount.


Do you still think there is absolutely no reason to be looking at Larry Warren, his evidence and his stories that never match? That is even stranger than the ET UFO enigma itself.

Expect an update tomorrow. To be continued.....

Larry Warren issues statement about his documents. Col Charles Halt responds.

Warrens OPTI/RET/BURN certificate compilation of his own handwriting and various peoples handwriting from documents and autographed photograph of Yoko Ono.

After publishing my blog Larry Warrens A10 UFO Photograph is Irrefutably a Genuine Fake. where I discuss the fact that Alyson Dunlop and myself are spearheading a campaign to raise the funds necessary to have the handwriting on Warrens military documents and also letters of authentication which accompany his alleged rock star items examined, Tino Megero published a statement for Larry Warren, by Larry Warren, about the authenticity of his paperwork. He states that Col Charles Halt actually examined them and stated they were real.

I sent this statement to Charles Halt for obvious reasons. This was his response.

"The only thing I told him is they looked real but I was in no position to authenticate them as he briefly flashed them in front of me. The Eye Doctor at Bentwaters at that time was Lester Sharpton.  I knew him well as we were both Boy Scout Leaders. If Larry had an eye problem that's who he would have seen. Never heard of the other supposed doctor he claims saw him. I suspect the appointment slip he shows was for his discharge physical and he altered it. If he had cornea burn there should have been followup and perhaps a disability rating. More BS"!

The image at the top of the page is the actual copy of his medical paper where you can clearly see areas have been covered with liquid paper and then written over again. These sheets are in a book, why not scrap it and write a new one if that much was wrong with it.. and how hard is it to spell OPTI/RET/BURN which is actually barely visible on the original but miraculously clear as the moon on a cloudless night in the book Left at East Gate.

Lee Swain cannot spell his own name correctly and both Lee and the medical officer capitalise letters mid word. 

The most interesting and obvious mistake on this document is the fact that Lee Swain spelled his name wrongly twice on the same sheet of paper and used two different pens to do so! For some reason he spelled his own name LEA not LEE. Twice. I just had to say it again.

Another weird one is that both Lee Swain and the Medical officer nobody knows, BOTH capitalize letters mid word. Full ExAm in the med cert and InTro in his in-processing instruction sheet. Quite unusual. Nothing to worry about we are all just making this up to get at him. You'd think that these would be reasonable observations and there is absolutely no cause to look at them at all never mind forensically!!! What do forensics prove anyway!

So here we are with almost £600 to have his handwriting analysed because we can't have the documents themselves analysed (seeing as Warren has them). We offered and re stated that HE could choose the company and liaise with them directly and provide his documents for analysis to prove us wrong. and to once and for all and forever more prove his innocence. Never again will anyone be able to call him a liar. Nope. He has the documents, he is keeping them and he thinks everyone is going to get a refund because we can't analyse the documents and he won't have them analysed even though it would cost him nothing, we have the money. Besides Col Halt said they are real. "Nuff said". Only... It isn't the actual documents that are being analysed, we never said that. Only his handwriting.

Earth Mystery News video
This is the envelope containing the letter he sent to his mum, I've used segments of this to compare handwriting on the medical certificate. If you go to earth Mystery news there is a 12 minute video of Larry discussing the letter and his trip to Germany that we already know he didn't go on. He even likened my lovely friend Ali to an Amsterdam prostitute for saying as much.

Even the Pope hath spoken! Nick has publicly supported this initiative to have the documents analysed from day one. In July 2016 he posted the now famous for all the wrong reasons, the Larry Warren and John Lennon photograph which until recently he has insisted is real. He even insisted to his Co Author Peter Robbins it was real, see my blog Peter Robbins splits with Larry Warren It's Official!! he divorced him for that very reason. Here is Nick's most recent post regarding the criticism he has had for supporting me throughout this investigation.

Because Nick has been in full support after seeing the Lennongate photo he has obviously come under assault from Larry and Co. Tino Megero created a Mr Bean meme which is pretty lame to be fair, but also ridiculous. Then a hate campaign started, calling him into question for all kinds of reasons. Announcements were being made about Nick on a regular basis with the usual suspects chipping in, and also the unusual suspects had a go. More surprising than anything was the fact that Gary heseltine joined in, not only under his own facebook profile but in the name of his facebook group UFO Truth Magazine. Not only was Nick under fire but anyone who supported me, any of the people investigating with me or anyone showing support.

Not long ago Warren stated to Nigel Mortimer that anyone on my friends list on Facebook is brainless scum, anyone supporting me is a troll. That seems to have been given a revival. UFO Truth Magazine announced that I was running a hate campaign with John Hanson!! I don't know how that came about, firstly it isn't a hate campaign, there have been no words of hatred in any of my writings, only facts and the only thing John and I do is talk on the phone and recently decided wouldn't it be brilliant if Col Halt could come over to the UK and take us on a walk of the forest and then after the walk have a nice sit down social where we can engage with him rather than him being on stage telling us what he assumes we want to hear. The conference format is getting old. I decided to start a kind of open mic paranormal interest event here in Liverpool. We decided to adapt that format into something really special.

Obviously that has come under fire. Are we all allowed to come they ask, after they all were happy for me to be banned from the SPI conference. Erm.. No was the short answer... Bleating began. The top and bottom line is, they have been attacking Halt for years, creating memes, all involved in the conversation under the meme of Col Halt, all being so complimentary as you can imagine! So I told them, anyone can come but not everyone can come, some absolutely will be turned away at the door if they arrive because quite simply, there will be no event if those people decide to come. He just will not engage with them. I agree with his sentiments.

The most confusing thing of all is why anyone would be upset over this and I am also at a loss as to why Warren states he has the documents and everyone needs a refund because he won't have them authenticated. On top of the A10 photographs he swore on his sons head were real, there are issues with all of his so called evidence. The bottom right handwriting in blue ink is supposed to be Yoko Ono's. He posted an image he says I can shove up my arse, of him standing at least a foot taller than Yoko Ono when in reality he is about five inches taller than Yoko.

As you can see.. Misty dirt on glass top left and reflection of a camera lens in the center.

Newer version with weird dark triangular shadowing and previously unseen autograph..

So he says this is real too. signed in 2007. Are we supposed to believe this was taken ten years ago while he was in his forties? If it was taken in 1997 as he told me many times, then why did he take an old photo for her to sign? Why not get a new one? He looks younger in this photo with Yoko than he does in the one he generated with Lennon.

Allegedly taken in 1980!!!!

Up-on closer inspection of the Yoko photo, obviously issues arise. Why is he so much taller than her? he would have to be over six feet tall. Anyway, analysis was done, it's not quite right. The first version he posted doesn't synch with the second one.

Then there is the matter of Yoko Ono's signature looking nothing like her signature.

The best bit is yet to come... Now the rumour has started that I faked the John Lennon picture one night with Larry for a laugh. Yep! That's what is being said. So.. You know right at the beginning when he put it up and said it was real and has insisted to his detriment ever since... Instead of all this rigmarole, why didn't I just say.. Hang on a minute.. We did that for a laugh one night! Several complete strangers have thrown this at me with all the smuggest,  all knowing arrogance they could muster, I just laugh. No one has refuted this from the Warren camp, I guess they are hoping that if they tell enough strangers it will become a factoid. The most amusing irony is, two of them have fake names on their accounts!!! One of them got reported for that very thing, they just KNEW it was me, even though it was on Nick Popes thread with a billion eyeballs on it. I am just so badass!

Currently someone is working hard on "taking me down", He is going to prove the photos Warren says are real, were faked by me. There are no words... I'll end here.

Next!!

Ben Emlyn Jones sets the internet on Barry Greenwood, who is he???

BUFOG member states I faked the photo and Warren's ex wife confirms this, according to said same member who shall remain nameless. I can repost his stuff though. He did say he wasn't "fussed", something tells me he will be "fussed". He'll even be fussed about me saying anything about him not being fussed.

Barry Greenwood issues statement in response to Ben setting the internet on him, explaining the history of the A10 photograph and Warren's claim he took it on the 28th of December 1980. They were actually taken on his honeymoon in 1985.


Oh... There's just one more thing..... Why would Gordon Williams sign his name with a thumb print and not his signature? This could have been typed by anyone with a type writer or word processor.

NON FULFILMENT of guaranteed training enlistee program agreement.. has not been met. Approval of WARREN'S REQUEST to separate. IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF HIMSELF AND AND THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE.

Doesn't sound too honourable to me, especially when you consider attempts to enlist elsewhere were met with a brick wall. Oh we know he says it's all a big conspiracy.... Well I'm testing that that theory to see how it pans out.

December to JUNE? Familiar looking signature up top...

May??? I thought it said June in the training record??

You know.. Now I have finished this blog, I can see how stupid I have been. Warren is right.. there is nothing to see here... Move along. I am just a crazy person.


To be continued....