Sacha Christie and Nick Pope faked the photos in 2014.

According to camp Warren.

Last night it was brought to my attention that the people in Warrens circle of unwitting deceit are saying that I faked the A10 photograph. Not quite sure how that works seeing as warren uploaded the version himself after Mick sayer found the ufos in it in 2014. Pretty sure that was the year. Before he moved in with us, before he uploaded anything onto my partners laptop. BEFORE anything out of the ordinary became apparent.

Various people were zooming in on the UFOs and discovered the reflection of a camera lens. something I have pointed out MANY times in various photographs of Warrens. I have said before he takes photos of photos. His Yoko Ono photo was a photo of a photo. Now I noticed something else about the Yoko photo.. a dirty misty patch in the top left.

Camera lense in center. 

Misty dirty corner. Photo behind glass. Trademark Warren.

But that misty corner is a massive problem for me because of this photo Warren posted as another one of his UFO photos. Taken DURING the events in the forest in 1980 according to him. But actually he first told Georgina Bruni in You Can't Tell The People, that a guy called Mike took them and gave them to him and he held onto them for 19 years!!! Until he handed them to Georgina. After one week of handing them over, he called her and told her, he had taken them and then went into a long story and that he had smuggled them in a German Stein from his trip to Germany that he also told her he never went on.

UFO Photo

Actual image found in Warrens photos on the laptop he used for four months while staying with us for just three weeks. cough.

So....

An upload by Warren of the image with camera reflection saying i can shove this image up my ass.

Later version with bottom half and no camera lens but all kinds of weird shading and shadows. He is also only in reality a few inches taller than Yoko. Not an entire 12 inches. He would be around 6' 2" but in reality he is about 5'7 maybe at a push 5' 8''

Just Sayin......

Nuff said?

Pass the napalm.

Barry Greenwood issues a statement. Warrens latest A10 photograph is not original.

2015 version of the A10 photograph taken 28th December 1980 according to Larry warren

In my previous blog Larry Warrens A10 UFO Photograph is Irrefutably a Genuine Fake. I explained all the issues I had found with the photograph. Shortly afterwards a very badly informed Ben Emlyn Jones wrote a blog castigating my analysis and proffering his own opinion. He had one photograph to base his conclusions and and he didn't have Barry Greenwood to consult with. Not that he even knows who he is. He keeps mentioning Larry's laptop in his blog. Nothing was left here of Larrys. He used my partners laptop for the four months he was here. He used it as his own and loaded all of his photographs onto it. He was thrown out some months later we didn't even realise they were there until we went looking through his internet history for other reasons. But conspiracy theories rage!

As part of Ben Emlyn Jones special investigation he offered his own explanation of the photographs which is hilarious to me, considering the amount of evidence I have and considering the standard of this ongoing investigation. He also demands to know who Barry Greenwood really is and calls for the internet to get a hold of him Nice... Set the internet on a man in his 70's way to go Ben. Why didn't you just try finding our his email address and write to him yourself? Release the flying monkeys, Ben has a right to know.

Ben's wildly inaccurate blog  The amended version that is. He does that a lot. Gets things wrong and alters them without noting the edit for the reader. So when originally they thought they saw my reflection in the image of the photo of the photo.. trademark Warren... It's now evolved into it looks like Nick Pope in the reflection... short grey spikey hair and glasses perhaps? A bit like Warren? this is just so ridiculous, and Warren is letting Ben generate these ridiculous explanations. Well, it's not like I haven't said it before, I said he would do it to SPI Scotland and he did.

Here are some of the images they have produced to prove it was me or Nick.. Only I recognise the chain, I recognise the camera and I recognise the hairline. You will have to squint a bit, these images are trying to enhance the reflection in the photo. Pretty good work I have to say! Very helpful indeed!

Hairline matches the reflection

But if you mirror the image with the camera lens reflection on it, you can see that it says Nikon.

Nikon Camera.

Larrys files. Look at the dates for both of them. 

As soon as I read what he'd written in his blog I wrote to Barry who a really real person, he really is called Barry and really is THE Barry Greenwood, author of Clear Intent. That book was the first comprehensive book of interviews and documentation along with the story of the Rendlesham Forest incidents and as I have said before, I was sent all of Barry's research material. Warren knows this is true. IF he has seen anything I have presented recently, he knows it's true, yet he allows and probably encourages Ben to go forth an be wrong in the name of Warren. He did it to me! He'd known me for nine years and he did it to me. He is doing it to everyone. He never speaks for himself, he has others do it for him while he hides behind them and then his computer screen attacking everyone while accusing everyone of hiding behind their computer screens. He still says it. I said I would go to the SPI conference and ask him a question, face to face, not behind a screen... Well, we all know how that ended after his threat to put my windpipe through my spine if I did. If Ben ever questions Larry in any meaningful way, Warren will turn on him in an instant, just as he did with his friend and Co Author Peter Robbins, and myself and anyone else who has dared to say anything I say is a valid point that obviously just needs a simple explanation... No. It never is ok to question anything at all.

Barry responded to me with a statement.

I have shared all of my findings with Barry and have checked and double checked the facts. Those facts are that the A10 photograph was taken on Warren's honeymoon in 1985 and has been tampered with. Ben suggests that the tampering was done by myself. I deny that completely and have shown every step of my thought processes and presented evidence by the bucket load.

But this is where the next twist is being fed into the drama. The twist that I have generated every bit of false evidence myself and by golly are certain people going to prove it. I don't know where it started but nobody has tried to stop it. The story is that I faked the photos. I also faked the John Lennon photo for laugh one night with Warren and apparently his ex wife has confirmed this. For starters, just no.. He stated categorically he was his friend, the photo is real and even went as far as saying he met him when he was a bodyguard for many stars in some blub published by Cameo Auction house and published in NME. John Lennon died in 1980. Warren was just 19.

Secondly, whats the story behind it and her knowing it was a joint moment of fun? Was she here too? Why then has she supported him all through his it's real phase into now saying I did it phase. Did she even say that? Was the BUFOG member lying? No one has countered this with anything. No one has tried to stop another lie forming and it has begun to spread between the few people still listening to them and hide behind fake names on their profiles!!

Then there is the new story about the Green fake Jerry Garcia painting he sold through Special Auction Services. He said it was stolen. Ok.. So... It was stolen and then sold in the same auction house as his other items a year later? One of which can be seen being pulled out of a box with the auction house's own tape on it. Stolen but sold in the same auction house his own items were sold. It was put on the Special Auction services page as sold for £8,000 and Alan Pritchard, the man Warren accused of stealing his stuff, liked the post. I communicated with Alan and Special Auction Services while having Warren's items returned. Another friend also involved themselves, he wanted to remain anonymous but Warren has blurted out who it was and handed all the credit to him making it look like it was nothing to do with me. I have already produced the emails in an earlier post. But then he tries to tie it into another auction ''bust'' that happened in 2011. He insists he gave evidence to put them away but in fact he only used them to sell his items and they were jailed in 2011. This painting was sold in 2013. He also stated that he was there at Reading Crown Court where they were sentenced. Only they were sentenced in Berkshire and were investigated by the National Trading Standards who do not require civilian witnesses because they do everything under cover. He was not part of the investigation, he was part of the problem that started the investigation.

So after this horror of a time with Cameo he decides to go to the auction house one of the auctioneers from Cameo went to work. If you had been ripped off by a company would you follow one of it's employee's and use them again? Well it seems that special auction services have been noticed by National Trading Standards due to the complaints of another person who see's that they sell items grossly under value which then sell again for one hundred times their purchase price. It's all over their facebook page in visitor posts. From the content you will see it's nothing to do with Warren and so it definitely isn't me. Unless of course Warren has now branched out into selling fancy crockery.

Auction house version with alleged Garcia signature

Warrens version as found on my partners computer (properties etc in another blog) which has LW signature mark. 

It is being said that the auction house version isn't even the same as the Warren version. Well when I looked on their site the image had been reversed and flipped. Set that right and it matches every tiny detail perfectly. I must have sat and painted this in great detail and years ago too and then somehow warren had the real one and it got stolen by someone and sold by SAS. How stupid do I think he is? Immeasurably so.

All points touched upon here have been evidenced in previous blogs. I am considering publishing the 80 pages of evidence of sales, and all of his memorabilia. Someone pointed out I should publish the items he has so that people can be aware of them. He has items if accepted as real would fetch a Million English pounds. The genuine items have sold for that amount.


Do you still think there is absolutely no reason to be looking at Larry Warren, his evidence and his stories that never match? That is even stranger than the ET UFO enigma itself.

Expect an update tomorrow. To be continued.....

Larry Warren issues statement about his documents. Col Charles Halt responds.

Warrens OPTI/RET/BURN certificate compilation of his own handwriting and various peoples handwriting from documents and autographed photograph of Yoko Ono.

After publishing my blog Larry Warrens A10 UFO Photograph is Irrefutably a Genuine Fake. where I discuss the fact that Alyson Dunlop and myself are spearheading a campaign to raise the funds necessary to have the handwriting on Warrens military documents and also letters of authentication which accompany his alleged rock star items examined, Tino Megero published a statement for Larry Warren, by Larry Warren, about the authenticity of his paperwork. He states that Col Charles Halt actually examined them and stated they were real.

I sent this statement to Charles Halt for obvious reasons. This was his response.

"The only thing I told him is they looked real but I was in no position to authenticate them as he briefly flashed them in front of me. The Eye Doctor at Bentwaters at that time was Lester Sharpton.  I knew him well as we were both Boy Scout Leaders. If Larry had an eye problem that's who he would have seen. Never heard of the other supposed doctor he claims saw him. I suspect the appointment slip he shows was for his discharge physical and he altered it. If he had cornea burn there should have been followup and perhaps a disability rating. More BS"!

The image at the top of the page is the actual copy of his medical paper where you can clearly see areas have been covered with liquid paper and then written over again. These sheets are in a book, why not scrap it and write a new one if that much was wrong with it.. and how hard is it to spell OPTI/RET/BURN which is actually barely visible on the original but miraculously clear as the moon on a cloudless night in the book Left at East Gate.

Lee Swain cannot spell his own name correctly and both Lee and the medical officer capitalise letters mid word. 

The most interesting and obvious mistake on this document is the fact that Lee Swain spelled his name wrongly twice on the same sheet of paper and used two different pens to do so! For some reason he spelled his own name LEA not LEE. Twice. I just had to say it again.

Another weird one is that both Lee Swain and the Medical officer nobody knows, BOTH capitalize letters mid word. Full ExAm in the med cert and InTro in his in-processing instruction sheet. Quite unusual. Nothing to worry about we are all just making this up to get at him. You'd think that these would be reasonable observations and there is absolutely no cause to look at them at all never mind forensically!!! What do forensics prove anyway!

So here we are with almost £600 to have his handwriting analysed because we can't have the documents themselves analysed (seeing as Warren has them). We offered and re stated that HE could choose the company and liaise with them directly and provide his documents for analysis to prove us wrong. and to once and for all and forever more prove his innocence. Never again will anyone be able to call him a liar. Nope. He has the documents, he is keeping them and he thinks everyone is going to get a refund because we can't analyse the documents and he won't have them analysed even though it would cost him nothing, we have the money. Besides Col Halt said they are real. "Nuff said". Only... It isn't the actual documents that are being analysed, we never said that. Only his handwriting.

Earth Mystery News video
This is the envelope containing the letter he sent to his mum, I've used segments of this to compare handwriting on the medical certificate. If you go to earth Mystery news there is a 12 minute video of Larry discussing the letter and his trip to Germany that we already know he didn't go on. He even likened my lovely friend Ali to an Amsterdam prostitute for saying as much.

Even the Pope hath spoken! Nick has publicly supported this initiative to have the documents analysed from day one. In July 2016 he posted the now famous for all the wrong reasons, the Larry Warren and John Lennon photograph which until recently he has insisted is real. He even insisted to his Co Author Peter Robbins it was real, see my blog Peter Robbins splits with Larry Warren It's Official!! he divorced him for that very reason. Here is Nick's most recent post regarding the criticism he has had for supporting me throughout this investigation.

Because Nick has been in full support after seeing the Lennongate photo he has obviously come under assault from Larry and Co. Tino Megero created a Mr Bean meme which is pretty lame to be fair, but also ridiculous. Then a hate campaign started, calling him into question for all kinds of reasons. Announcements were being made about Nick on a regular basis with the usual suspects chipping in, and also the unusual suspects had a go. More surprising than anything was the fact that Gary heseltine joined in, not only under his own facebook profile but in the name of his facebook group UFO Truth Magazine. Not only was Nick under fire but anyone who supported me, any of the people investigating with me or anyone showing support.

Not long ago Warren stated to Nigel Mortimer that anyone on my friends list on Facebook is brainless scum, anyone supporting me is a troll. That seems to have been given a revival. UFO Truth Magazine announced that I was running a hate campaign with John Hanson!! I don't know how that came about, firstly it isn't a hate campaign, there have been no words of hatred in any of my writings, only facts and the only thing John and I do is talk on the phone and recently decided wouldn't it be brilliant if Col Halt could come over to the UK and take us on a walk of the forest and then after the walk have a nice sit down social where we can engage with him rather than him being on stage telling us what he assumes we want to hear. The conference format is getting old. I decided to start a kind of open mic paranormal interest event here in Liverpool. We decided to adapt that format into something really special.

Obviously that has come under fire. Are we all allowed to come they ask, after they all were happy for me to be banned from the SPI conference. Erm.. No was the short answer... Bleating began. The top and bottom line is, they have been attacking Halt for years, creating memes, all involved in the conversation under the meme of Col Halt, all being so complimentary as you can imagine! So I told them, anyone can come but not everyone can come, some absolutely will be turned away at the door if they arrive because quite simply, there will be no event if those people decide to come. He just will not engage with them. I agree with his sentiments.

The most confusing thing of all is why anyone would be upset over this and I am also at a loss as to why Warren states he has the documents and everyone needs a refund because he won't have them authenticated. On top of the A10 photographs he swore on his sons head were real, there are issues with all of his so called evidence. The bottom right handwriting in blue ink is supposed to be Yoko Ono's. He posted an image he says I can shove up my arse, of him standing at least a foot taller than Yoko Ono when in reality he is about five inches taller than Yoko.

As you can see.. Misty dirt on glass top left and reflection of a camera lens in the center.

Newer version with weird dark triangular shadowing and previously unseen autograph..

So he says this is real too. signed in 2007. Are we supposed to believe this was taken ten years ago while he was in his forties? If it was taken in 1997 as he told me many times, then why did he take an old photo for her to sign? Why not get a new one? He looks younger in this photo with Yoko than he does in the one he generated with Lennon.

Allegedly taken in 1980!!!!

Up-on closer inspection of the Yoko photo, obviously issues arise. Why is he so much taller than her? he would have to be over six feet tall. Anyway, analysis was done, it's not quite right. The first version he posted doesn't synch with the second one.

Then there is the matter of Yoko Ono's signature looking nothing like her signature.

The best bit is yet to come... Now the rumour has started that I faked the John Lennon picture one night with Larry for a laugh. Yep! That's what is being said. So.. You know right at the beginning when he put it up and said it was real and has insisted to his detriment ever since... Instead of all this rigmarole, why didn't I just say.. Hang on a minute.. We did that for a laugh one night! Several complete strangers have thrown this at me with all the smuggest,  all knowing arrogance they could muster, I just laugh. No one has refuted this from the Warren camp, I guess they are hoping that if they tell enough strangers it will become a factoid. The most amusing irony is, two of them have fake names on their accounts!!! One of them got reported for that very thing, they just KNEW it was me, even though it was on Nick Popes thread with a billion eyeballs on it. I am just so badass!

Currently someone is working hard on "taking me down", He is going to prove the photos Warren says are real, were faked by me. There are no words... I'll end here.

Next!!

Ben Emlyn Jones sets the internet on Barry Greenwood, who is he???

BUFOG member states I faked the photo and Warren's ex wife confirms this, according to said same member who shall remain nameless. I can repost his stuff though. He did say he wasn't "fussed", something tells me he will be "fussed". He'll even be fussed about me saying anything about him not being fussed.

Barry Greenwood issues statement in response to Ben setting the internet on him, explaining the history of the A10 photograph and Warren's claim he took it on the 28th of December 1980. They were actually taken on his honeymoon in 1985.


Oh... There's just one more thing..... Why would Gordon Williams sign his name with a thumb print and not his signature? This could have been typed by anyone with a type writer or word processor.

NON FULFILMENT of guaranteed training enlistee program agreement.. has not been met. Approval of WARREN'S REQUEST to separate. IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF HIMSELF AND AND THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE.

Doesn't sound too honourable to me, especially when you consider attempts to enlist elsewhere were met with a brick wall. Oh we know he says it's all a big conspiracy.... Well I'm testing that that theory to see how it pans out.

December to JUNE? Familiar looking signature up top...

May??? I thought it said June in the training record??

You know.. Now I have finished this blog, I can see how stupid I have been. Warren is right.. there is nothing to see here... Move along. I am just a crazy person.


To be continued....

Larry Warrens A10 UFO Photograph is Irrefutably a Genuine Fake.

A10 Photograph Taken 28th December 1980 by Larry Warren

Many of you already know that recently I revealed some controversial information regarding the photograph of an A10 accompanied byu two unidentified flying objects. Larry Warren says he took this photograph himself on the 28th of December 1980. 

I know for a fact that is a complete and utter lie. He has generated this image to cement himself into the Rendlesham Forest Incidents. Why would he do that if his story stands? Quite obviously even he knows there are issues, as there always have been. He needs to convince us all and so his evidence grows year by year, all of it fake. 

Recently I was sent a lot of valuable research material which belongs to Barry Greenwood, Author of Clear Intent which was also written with Larry Fawcett.. The material sent included a whole bunch of photographs given to Fawcett and Greenwood by Warren who at that time had been going by the name of Art Wallace. I stated this in my last blog Peter Robbins splits with Larry Warren It's Official!!

Obviously since that day there has been a response, the facebook post at the top of this page. Bitch please! Bruce Maccabee says it's the real deal and he should know! Well that's at least one thing we agree on Larry. He should know. I know he has been approached and asked by another interested party and the response was that Bruce had taken the photo at face value and was standing by his conclusion that it is a genuine photograph, despite the fact that the original photograph was in colour and has nothing above it at all and the one Warren produced is black and white and has many many issues. 

Image found in files left on my partners laptop by Larry Warren while living with us.

A10 with anomalies and coffee cup ring..strange blobs and marks bottom right.

Image analysis by Mick Sayer

Image with inlays

Close up of alleged genuine UFO

In situ

Smaller object. I will come back to this later in the blog. Seemingly insignificant. It'[s not.

 

Screenshot of the A10 photograph in a photograph album, same roll of film. All colour.

A few months ago I was sent the research notes of Clear Intent as I covered in my previous blog. this material has been invaluable and I am grateful to Barry Greenwood and also Paul Dean for their support and input. I could not have figured this out without these notes. Barry was given material by Warren in the form of documentation, photographs, statements etc. the main issue I had was why is the photograph now black and white and why was it previously UFO free. Reasonable questions I am sure you will agree. so i will show you once again his response to me pointing these issues out and speculating.

Bitch please! It was taken 28th December.

Well, it's a bit weird then that I spotted this while I was flicking through the album last night.

It is so tiny, I really didn't give it much attention.Obviously I had a blinding lightbulb moment.

As Larry tells us in the book Left at East Gate, he visited England with his new bride after their wedding in May 1985. The A10 photograph was taken in June 1985 and not on the 28th of December 1980. That is a total lie. The objects in the photograph were also added later, the colour shifted into black and white to blend away many sins. It's entirely fake. 

I have to ask what else has he faked? He has faked so much. If you read back through my blogs you will wonder as I do, who the hell is Larry Warren, does he even know? 

There are so many issues with his handwriting, his documents, all of his letters of authentication. I have previously shown many issues with his LOAs and I have found the same issues with his handwriting on his documents. Recently a row erupted with Peter Robbins with plagiarist James Francis Welsh. Peter insists that they are real and the handwriting is not Warrens and so Alyson Dunlop and I after consulting with a few others, agreed that a GoFundMe account should be set up to have the handwriting analysed. 

We know full well that Warren will not cooperate with this and so it is highly unlikely the documents themselves will be forensically examined by a professional independent handwriting analyst so we will have to settle on the handwriting itself. 

Personally, if I was in Warrens position and completely innocent, I would have taken up the offer of choosing a forensic company myself and staying in full control of the documents. I would want to prove everyone calling me a fraud, wrong. I would pick the company and communicate directly with them myself and would ask my own friends to contribute to prove my innocence once and for all. For some strange reason that is not what is happening. A furor has erupted with Ben Emlyn Jones asking

Yet in the same conversation, David Young asks Ben Emlyn Jones what he did with the money David had donated to Ben's GoFundMe appeal for a nice new laptop for himself. At first he didn't even know what David meant, then casually stated he had used it for his radio show... He didn't ask any of his contributors if that was okay then? Hypocrisy at it's absolute finest. In the same thread, just minutes apart. Just wow.

So as it stands we have collected almost the entire £600 necessary for a totally independent, professional forensic service. All accounts, minus personal information, will be made available along with invoices, receipts and any communications such as emails, letters etc. 

IF there happens to be a few pounds left over you can be sure it will be given to a Veterans Fund. If we could have afforded to pay for this ourselves, we would have done. We are extremely grateful to everyone who has contributed in whatever way they could, even sharing the post itself is very much appreciated. 

We are not quite at target so if you would like to contribute, this is the link. 

Analysis of Larry Warren's Writing

With all the previous evidence I have presented and evidences yet to come, I am sure you can appreciate the need for this to be done. It is the only way to prove one way or another if Warren has forged his documents. We can see he has no issue with lying and faking. he admitted to Georgina Bruni that he faked his hypnosis session because someone had paid for it and he didn't want to let them down, him being such a people pleaser an' all...

The Second UFO Furor

Remember this? 

This past week UFO witness and researcher Victor Nevada put a very angry post on face book. He had recently seen the Warren photograph and had noticed that the UFO #2 looked identical to his own. He had in fact shown this to Larry warren some time ago. 

Victor Nevada's Facebook Post

All Copyright belongs to Victor Nevada. Image taken by Victor Nevada from his bedroom window at 5.13 pm on Friday 2nd July 2004

With just a small amount of smudging, the same amount given to what looks to be an Attack Helicopter, blend with black and white. I can see what Victor is seeing. 

But there's just one more thing..... 

All of Larry Warrens evidence needs detailed inspection. 

So if I may be so bold, I think Bruce Maccabee has taken the photograph sent to him by Larry Warren on face value. I am not a professional image analyst but I have found multiple issues and there are other evidences previously unavailable to Bruce. I am sure he would probably reconsider his conclusion when all of the other evidences have been put before him. Respectfully of course. I had to bring this up due to the fact warren keeps insisting it is real because Bruce Maccabee who is very well known for his expertise in image analysis, says it is genuine. I mean no disrespect to Bruce when I say this. 

There are more issues I am going to put to you but they will be in another blog. This A10 photograph as far as I am concerned is a Genuine Larry Warren Fake. 

As for James Francis Welsh who says I have hijacked his research, I only have three words to say. Shut up James.

Here is my blog about James stealing my research, he now claims as his own and is accusing me of stealing it from him. so he has now decided the best course of action is to behave exactly like Larry Warren. This blog entry has had another surge of people reading it. I wonder why? 

Compare The Mongoose.Con James Francis Welsh's ridiculous attempt at theft and public humiliation.

Next... 

The new rumour that I faked the Larry Warren Photo with Larry for a laugh. It was apparently a joke. You're not kidding... !!!!

Gary Heseltine's stand off with Nick Pope and the UFO Truth Magazine attacks on him.

More evidence of altered images of him with the rich and famous and yet another dodgy UFO photograph. 

Until then here is a reminder about the other Genuine Larry Warren Fantasies

Allegedly 19 in this photograph hanging with lennon. Bottom image inserted recently, Larry aged 19

Warren claims the green Garcia Painting was stolen from him yet the thief uses the same auction house as himself and coincidentally, the painting was in the same auction lot as his not stolen Garcia painting. .

To be continued............