Barry Greenwood issues a statement. Warrens latest A10 photograph is not original.

2015 version of the A10 photograph taken 28th December 1980 according to Larry warren

In my previous blog Larry Warrens A10 UFO Photograph is Irrefutably a Genuine Fake. I explained all the issues I had found with the photograph. Shortly afterwards a very badly informed Ben Emlyn Jones wrote a blog castigating my analysis and proffering his own opinion. He had one photograph to base his conclusions and and he didn't have Barry Greenwood to consult with. Not that he even knows who he is. He keeps mentioning Larry's laptop in his blog. Nothing was left here of Larrys. He used my partners laptop for the four months he was here. He used it as his own and loaded all of his photographs onto it. He was thrown out some months later we didn't even realise they were there until we went looking through his internet history for other reasons. But conspiracy theories rage!

As part of Ben Emlyn Jones special investigation he offered his own explanation of the photographs which is hilarious to me, considering the amount of evidence I have and considering the standard of this ongoing investigation. He also demands to know who Barry Greenwood really is and calls for the internet to get a hold of him Nice... Set the internet on a man in his 70's way to go Ben. Why didn't you just try finding our his email address and write to him yourself? Release the flying monkeys, Ben has a right to know.

Ben's wildly inaccurate blog  The amended version that is. He does that a lot. Gets things wrong and alters them without noting the edit for the reader. So when originally they thought they saw my reflection in the image of the photo of the photo.. trademark Warren... It's now evolved into it looks like Nick Pope in the reflection... short grey spikey hair and glasses perhaps? A bit like Warren? this is just so ridiculous, and Warren is letting Ben generate these ridiculous explanations. Well, it's not like I haven't said it before, I said he would do it to SPI Scotland and he did.

Here are some of the images they have produced to prove it was me or Nick.. Only I recognise the chain, I recognise the camera and I recognise the hairline. You will have to squint a bit, these images are trying to enhance the reflection in the photo. Pretty good work I have to say! Very helpful indeed!

Hairline matches the reflection

But if you mirror the image with the camera lens reflection on it, you can see that it says Nikon.

Nikon Camera.

Larrys files. Look at the dates for both of them. 

As soon as I read what he'd written in his blog I wrote to Barry who a really real person, he really is called Barry and really is THE Barry Greenwood, author of Clear Intent. That book was the first comprehensive book of interviews and documentation along with the story of the Rendlesham Forest incidents and as I have said before, I was sent all of Barry's research material. Warren knows this is true. IF he has seen anything I have presented recently, he knows it's true, yet he allows and probably encourages Ben to go forth an be wrong in the name of Warren. He did it to me! He'd known me for nine years and he did it to me. He is doing it to everyone. He never speaks for himself, he has others do it for him while he hides behind them and then his computer screen attacking everyone while accusing everyone of hiding behind their computer screens. He still says it. I said I would go to the SPI conference and ask him a question, face to face, not behind a screen... Well, we all know how that ended after his threat to put my windpipe through my spine if I did. If Ben ever questions Larry in any meaningful way, Warren will turn on him in an instant, just as he did with his friend and Co Author Peter Robbins, and myself and anyone else who has dared to say anything I say is a valid point that obviously just needs a simple explanation... No. It never is ok to question anything at all.

Barry responded to me with a statement.

I have shared all of my findings with Barry and have checked and double checked the facts. Those facts are that the A10 photograph was taken on Warren's honeymoon in 1985 and has been tampered with. Ben suggests that the tampering was done by myself. I deny that completely and have shown every step of my thought processes and presented evidence by the bucket load.

But this is where the next twist is being fed into the drama. The twist that I have generated every bit of false evidence myself and by golly are certain people going to prove it. I don't know where it started but nobody has tried to stop it. The story is that I faked the photos. I also faked the John Lennon photo for laugh one night with Warren and apparently his ex wife has confirmed this. For starters, just no.. He stated categorically he was his friend, the photo is real and even went as far as saying he met him when he was a bodyguard for many stars in some blub published by Cameo Auction house and published in NME. John Lennon died in 1980. Warren was just 19.

Secondly, whats the story behind it and her knowing it was a joint moment of fun? Was she here too? Why then has she supported him all through his it's real phase into now saying I did it phase. Did she even say that? Was the BUFOG member lying? No one has countered this with anything. No one has tried to stop another lie forming and it has begun to spread between the few people still listening to them and hide behind fake names on their profiles!!

Then there is the new story about the Green fake Jerry Garcia painting he sold through Special Auction Services. He said it was stolen. Ok.. So... It was stolen and then sold in the same auction house as his other items a year later? One of which can be seen being pulled out of a box with the auction house's own tape on it. Stolen but sold in the same auction house his own items were sold. It was put on the Special Auction services page as sold for £8,000 and Alan Pritchard, the man Warren accused of stealing his stuff, liked the post. I communicated with Alan and Special Auction Services while having Warren's items returned. Another friend also involved themselves, he wanted to remain anonymous but Warren has blurted out who it was and handed all the credit to him making it look like it was nothing to do with me. I have already produced the emails in an earlier post. But then he tries to tie it into another auction ''bust'' that happened in 2011. He insists he gave evidence to put them away but in fact he only used them to sell his items and they were jailed in 2011. This painting was sold in 2013. He also stated that he was there at Reading Crown Court where they were sentenced. Only they were sentenced in Berkshire and were investigated by the National Trading Standards who do not require civilian witnesses because they do everything under cover. He was not part of the investigation, he was part of the problem that started the investigation.

So after this horror of a time with Cameo he decides to go to the auction house one of the auctioneers from Cameo went to work. If you had been ripped off by a company would you follow one of it's employee's and use them again? Well it seems that special auction services have been noticed by National Trading Standards due to the complaints of another person who see's that they sell items grossly under value which then sell again for one hundred times their purchase price. It's all over their facebook page in visitor posts. From the content you will see it's nothing to do with Warren and so it definitely isn't me. Unless of course Warren has now branched out into selling fancy crockery.

Auction house version with alleged Garcia signature

Warrens version as found on my partners computer (properties etc in another blog) which has LW signature mark. 

It is being said that the auction house version isn't even the same as the Warren version. Well when I looked on their site the image had been reversed and flipped. Set that right and it matches every tiny detail perfectly. I must have sat and painted this in great detail and years ago too and then somehow warren had the real one and it got stolen by someone and sold by SAS. How stupid do I think he is? Immeasurably so.

All points touched upon here have been evidenced in previous blogs. I am considering publishing the 80 pages of evidence of sales, and all of his memorabilia. Someone pointed out I should publish the items he has so that people can be aware of them. He has items if accepted as real would fetch a Million English pounds. The genuine items have sold for that amount.


Do you still think there is absolutely no reason to be looking at Larry Warren, his evidence and his stories that never match? That is even stranger than the ET UFO enigma itself.

Expect an update tomorrow. To be continued.....

Larry Warren issues statement about his documents. Col Charles Halt responds.

Warrens OPTI/RET/BURN certificate compilation of his own handwriting and various peoples handwriting from documents and autographed photograph of Yoko Ono.

After publishing my blog Larry Warrens A10 UFO Photograph is Irrefutably a Genuine Fake. where I discuss the fact that Alyson Dunlop and myself are spearheading a campaign to raise the funds necessary to have the handwriting on Warrens military documents and also letters of authentication which accompany his alleged rock star items examined, Tino Megero published a statement for Larry Warren, by Larry Warren, about the authenticity of his paperwork. He states that Col Charles Halt actually examined them and stated they were real.

I sent this statement to Charles Halt for obvious reasons. This was his response.

"The only thing I told him is they looked real but I was in no position to authenticate them as he briefly flashed them in front of me. The Eye Doctor at Bentwaters at that time was Lester Sharpton.  I knew him well as we were both Boy Scout Leaders. If Larry had an eye problem that's who he would have seen. Never heard of the other supposed doctor he claims saw him. I suspect the appointment slip he shows was for his discharge physical and he altered it. If he had cornea burn there should have been followup and perhaps a disability rating. More BS"!

The image at the top of the page is the actual copy of his medical paper where you can clearly see areas have been covered with liquid paper and then written over again. These sheets are in a book, why not scrap it and write a new one if that much was wrong with it.. and how hard is it to spell OPTI/RET/BURN which is actually barely visible on the original but miraculously clear as the moon on a cloudless night in the book Left at East Gate.

Lee Swain cannot spell his own name correctly and both Lee and the medical officer capitalise letters mid word. 

The most interesting and obvious mistake on this document is the fact that Lee Swain spelled his name wrongly twice on the same sheet of paper and used two different pens to do so! For some reason he spelled his own name LEA not LEE. Twice. I just had to say it again.

Another weird one is that both Lee Swain and the Medical officer nobody knows, BOTH capitalize letters mid word. Full ExAm in the med cert and InTro in his in-processing instruction sheet. Quite unusual. Nothing to worry about we are all just making this up to get at him. You'd think that these would be reasonable observations and there is absolutely no cause to look at them at all never mind forensically!!! What do forensics prove anyway!

So here we are with almost £600 to have his handwriting analysed because we can't have the documents themselves analysed (seeing as Warren has them). We offered and re stated that HE could choose the company and liaise with them directly and provide his documents for analysis to prove us wrong. and to once and for all and forever more prove his innocence. Never again will anyone be able to call him a liar. Nope. He has the documents, he is keeping them and he thinks everyone is going to get a refund because we can't analyse the documents and he won't have them analysed even though it would cost him nothing, we have the money. Besides Col Halt said they are real. "Nuff said". Only... It isn't the actual documents that are being analysed, we never said that. Only his handwriting.

Earth Mystery News video
This is the envelope containing the letter he sent to his mum, I've used segments of this to compare handwriting on the medical certificate. If you go to earth Mystery news there is a 12 minute video of Larry discussing the letter and his trip to Germany that we already know he didn't go on. He even likened my lovely friend Ali to an Amsterdam prostitute for saying as much.

Even the Pope hath spoken! Nick has publicly supported this initiative to have the documents analysed from day one. In July 2016 he posted the now famous for all the wrong reasons, the Larry Warren and John Lennon photograph which until recently he has insisted is real. He even insisted to his Co Author Peter Robbins it was real, see my blog Peter Robbins splits with Larry Warren It's Official!! he divorced him for that very reason. Here is Nick's most recent post regarding the criticism he has had for supporting me throughout this investigation.

Because Nick has been in full support after seeing the Lennongate photo he has obviously come under assault from Larry and Co. Tino Megero created a Mr Bean meme which is pretty lame to be fair, but also ridiculous. Then a hate campaign started, calling him into question for all kinds of reasons. Announcements were being made about Nick on a regular basis with the usual suspects chipping in, and also the unusual suspects had a go. More surprising than anything was the fact that Gary heseltine joined in, not only under his own facebook profile but in the name of his facebook group UFO Truth Magazine. Not only was Nick under fire but anyone who supported me, any of the people investigating with me or anyone showing support.

Not long ago Warren stated to Nigel Mortimer that anyone on my friends list on Facebook is brainless scum, anyone supporting me is a troll. That seems to have been given a revival. UFO Truth Magazine announced that I was running a hate campaign with John Hanson!! I don't know how that came about, firstly it isn't a hate campaign, there have been no words of hatred in any of my writings, only facts and the only thing John and I do is talk on the phone and recently decided wouldn't it be brilliant if Col Halt could come over to the UK and take us on a walk of the forest and then after the walk have a nice sit down social where we can engage with him rather than him being on stage telling us what he assumes we want to hear. The conference format is getting old. I decided to start a kind of open mic paranormal interest event here in Liverpool. We decided to adapt that format into something really special.

Obviously that has come under fire. Are we all allowed to come they ask, after they all were happy for me to be banned from the SPI conference. Erm.. No was the short answer... Bleating began. The top and bottom line is, they have been attacking Halt for years, creating memes, all involved in the conversation under the meme of Col Halt, all being so complimentary as you can imagine! So I told them, anyone can come but not everyone can come, some absolutely will be turned away at the door if they arrive because quite simply, there will be no event if those people decide to come. He just will not engage with them. I agree with his sentiments.

The most confusing thing of all is why anyone would be upset over this and I am also at a loss as to why Warren states he has the documents and everyone needs a refund because he won't have them authenticated. On top of the A10 photographs he swore on his sons head were real, there are issues with all of his so called evidence. The bottom right handwriting in blue ink is supposed to be Yoko Ono's. He posted an image he says I can shove up my arse, of him standing at least a foot taller than Yoko Ono when in reality he is about five inches taller than Yoko.

As you can see.. Misty dirt on glass top left and reflection of a camera lens in the center.

Newer version with weird dark triangular shadowing and previously unseen autograph..

So he says this is real too. signed in 2007. Are we supposed to believe this was taken ten years ago while he was in his forties? If it was taken in 1997 as he told me many times, then why did he take an old photo for her to sign? Why not get a new one? He looks younger in this photo with Yoko than he does in the one he generated with Lennon.

Allegedly taken in 1980!!!!

Up-on closer inspection of the Yoko photo, obviously issues arise. Why is he so much taller than her? he would have to be over six feet tall. Anyway, analysis was done, it's not quite right. The first version he posted doesn't synch with the second one.

Then there is the matter of Yoko Ono's signature looking nothing like her signature.

The best bit is yet to come... Now the rumour has started that I faked the John Lennon picture one night with Larry for a laugh. Yep! That's what is being said. So.. You know right at the beginning when he put it up and said it was real and has insisted to his detriment ever since... Instead of all this rigmarole, why didn't I just say.. Hang on a minute.. We did that for a laugh one night! Several complete strangers have thrown this at me with all the smuggest,  all knowing arrogance they could muster, I just laugh. No one has refuted this from the Warren camp, I guess they are hoping that if they tell enough strangers it will become a factoid. The most amusing irony is, two of them have fake names on their accounts!!! One of them got reported for that very thing, they just KNEW it was me, even though it was on Nick Popes thread with a billion eyeballs on it. I am just so badass!

Currently someone is working hard on "taking me down", He is going to prove the photos Warren says are real, were faked by me. There are no words... I'll end here.

Next!!

Ben Emlyn Jones sets the internet on Barry Greenwood, who is he???

BUFOG member states I faked the photo and Warren's ex wife confirms this, according to said same member who shall remain nameless. I can repost his stuff though. He did say he wasn't "fussed", something tells me he will be "fussed". He'll even be fussed about me saying anything about him not being fussed.

Barry Greenwood issues statement in response to Ben setting the internet on him, explaining the history of the A10 photograph and Warren's claim he took it on the 28th of December 1980. They were actually taken on his honeymoon in 1985.


Oh... There's just one more thing..... Why would Gordon Williams sign his name with a thumb print and not his signature? This could have been typed by anyone with a type writer or word processor.

NON FULFILMENT of guaranteed training enlistee program agreement.. has not been met. Approval of WARREN'S REQUEST to separate. IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF HIMSELF AND AND THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE.

Doesn't sound too honourable to me, especially when you consider attempts to enlist elsewhere were met with a brick wall. Oh we know he says it's all a big conspiracy.... Well I'm testing that that theory to see how it pans out.

December to JUNE? Familiar looking signature up top...

May??? I thought it said June in the training record??

You know.. Now I have finished this blog, I can see how stupid I have been. Warren is right.. there is nothing to see here... Move along. I am just a crazy person.


To be continued....